Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve3cx@shaw.ca: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:59:35 -0500
While this sounds good in theory, please keep in mind that Ontario is a VERY large province. Personally, I know I have no hope of making it to the WRTC, and congrats to Jim Roberts who hails from the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00504.html (11,140 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Selection Criteria (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 05:30:53 -0500
This is actually a very good start. One other thing I would have is that there can be many qualifiers - perhaps even several hundred. Once the "short list" is established, there needs to be another c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00513.html (12,156 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] FW: [UK-CONTEST] CQ magazine to withdraw contestsponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:55:57 -0500
Before we get too excited about this, please look at the date.... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-04/msg00015.html (11,676 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 807s (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:05:40 -0400
Part of it seems to have been missed over the years. My understanding was that the 807 was a very popular tube with hams, and as the reference pointed out, tubes are bottles... I suspect the 807 must
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00165.html (8,569 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] combination of, bragging, back-scratching (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:23:13 -0500
My take on this is as follows: Contesting, by its very nature, requires that participants support each other to some extent. For example, I could try and "hurt" a fellow contester by not contacting h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00241.html (11,454 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] To be assisted or not to be assisted: that is thequestion. (long) (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:55:22 -0500
In looking at the rules for the CQWW, it seems to be very clear: A.Single Operator Categories: Single band or all band; only one signal is allow at any one time; the operator may change bands at any
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00394.html (21,279 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] To be assisted or not to be assisted: that is thequestion. (long) (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:31:08 -0500
By using a spotting network, you are being assisted in finding stations (multipliers) that you want/need to work. This gives you an advantage over a person who is not being assisted in finding statio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00399.html (24,974 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] To be assisted or not to be assisted: that is thequestion. (long) (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:21:14 -0500
Perhaps we do agree (which would be great), but what got me going was this: When I saw this, I went back and checked the rules.? Clearly, the use of a spotting network (even in a passive mode) places
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00413.html (12,137 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] SOxR -- enough already (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:45:52 -0500
I think you finally hit the nail on the head!? Being good at SO2R means you have spent a LOT of time with your radio(s) getting to that point - something that a "single radio contester just getting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00632.html (8,912 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:02:02 -0500
Hi Lee First off, I dont think there is a book on SO2R, and no, I didnt write it. I have been away from ham radio and contesting for a number of years, and upon returning was hit with all this talk o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00301.html (11,618 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] MO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:27:08 -0500
Hi Paul There is a category for this already - Multi-Single. The rules are a bit different than for single op - you can have several ops, run the whole contest period, and there are some changes rega
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00341.html (8,006 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <ve3cx@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:04:27 -0500
Hi Hans Some contests have a "Tribander?and Wires" class - perhaps adding this class to other contests would fill the need for the average ham who lives on a city lot with one tower and a tribander.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00399.html (9,199 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu