Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca: 166 ]

Total 166 documents matching your query.

81. [CQ-Contest] computers ruined contesting (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Fri Jul 4 00:09:38 2003
While I sympathize with the perception the points were unfairly dinged (who knows, maybe they were), I think this highlights a tweak that could be made to the system rather than a resounding condemna
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00055.html (11,371 bytes)

82. [CQ-Contest] computers ruined contesting (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Wed Jul 9 19:59:51 2003
I think Mark's right about this. Olympic athletes get no say in how drug tests are performed. They do, however, have a right to a full understanding of how the tests work. That's what the contest com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00117.html (13,097 bytes)

83. [CQ-Contest] Re: SCOURGES OF CONTESTING, CHAPTER 3 (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca)
Date: Thu Jul 10 12:45:12 2003
Hey wait a minute, this contest already exists. I think it's run on or about the first day of April each year. And I think Slug No.1 always wins. And I think there's a big bonus for QRT class. 73, ke
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00125.html (8,328 bytes)

84. [CQ-Contest] massaging the logs (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Sat Jul 19 16:22:19 2003
Just because a rule may be unenforceable doesn't mean it has no value. Many rules are completely unenforceable yet are valued by honorable operators as guidelines to operating in an ethical manner. (
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00208.html (10,195 bytes)

85. [CQ-Contest] Recording (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Mon Jul 21 21:42:06 2003
One fellow asked why recording a contest is so bad. I'm not sure it's "so bad," but I have a few reasons to dislike the practice. I don't mean to disparage anybody, but... To me, contesting is to Ama
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00219.html (9,043 bytes)

86. [CQ-Contest] Contesting from the basement (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Tue Jul 22 23:35:50 2003
Hi Jim, The things I like about the shack being below grade is a lack of exterior noise and a lack of exterior light. The things I don't like about the basement is a lack of exterior noise and a lack
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00244.html (12,424 bytes)

87. [CQ-Contest] SO2R boxes (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 18:07:10 -0500
Hi all, OK, so now that I have two radios and two antennas, as does my partner in crime, what does WX0B do? Discontinue the SO2R Master, of course! (no hard feelings Jay). What else is out there? We
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00047.html (7,725 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO B4 (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 22:05:54 -0500
I think this touches on an interesting topic: is any one station EVER worth the amount of time it will take to figure out who the non-IDing guy is? Take WW, for instance: 40 zones, 300-some countries
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00025.html (14,331 bytes)

89. Re: [CQ-Contest] Partial Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:57:16 -0500
It's interesting the issues that seem ripe for protest. To me, 59(9) probably leads the ranks of the most trivial of items to protest. Wastes time? Yes, but it wastes time for everybody equally (or i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00058.html (9,439 bytes)

90. [CQ-Contest] SS reporting in QST (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 22:00:44 -0600
Hello again, As with the last two years, I will again be authoring the writeup for Phone SS for QST. To make this as interesting as we can, I need your help. Please, at least a few of you have someon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00041.html (7,980 bytes)

91. Re: [CQ-Contest] The "Check" in SS (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:56:58 -0600
Hi all, Funny, in the 20 years I've been doing SS, nobody has ever raised this issue before. Here's my guess why: it just doesn't really matter. Why does ARRL specify the last two numbers of the lice
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00136.html (8,947 bytes)

92. [CQ-Contest] SS phone (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:40:35 -0600
Well, wasn't that a disaster? Sheesh, now we know how Jay feels. One-way prop seemed to dominate the weekend from here. It was only till late Sunday that things started to open up. There was no 15 an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00196.html (8,616 bytes)

93. Re: [CQ-Contest] "Please copy my number" (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 20:01:59 -0600
To me, anything that is NOT part of the exchange is a bad thing. Particularly during bad QRM. So "Please copy" and "check" could easily be confused as part of the exchange, and perhaps "4 M XY4XYZ 89
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00296.html (13,788 bytes)

94. Re: [CQ-Contest] Band edge --- how do you warn a guy? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 23:28:39 -0600
Hi Hans, Generous of you to want to ward off an infraction notice, but I'm not sure why it's much of an issue. Granted, I could just work the guy and not have to worry about band edge concerns, but I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00304.html (11,790 bytes)

95. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Question (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 21:36:55 -0600
Because it's the most damned fun SS will ever be? Sure, it's not for everyone, but don't begrudge someone who obviously so enjoys it that he has that weekend booked for the foreseeable future. And do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00363.html (11,037 bytes)

96. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS KP4 et all (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:33:27 -0600
Good thing the operation of WP3R is private and not a democracy! The problem with success is someone always tries to shoot you down. Go get 'em Rich, and let loose the dogs of war! Funny, what would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00462.html (13,096 bytes)

97. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet/Dx summit spots (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:39:43 -0600
Hi, I have to side with TTT on this one. People have to understand that not everybody in a contest has the same propagation as they: a G on 75 is pretty mundane for an east coaster. A G on 75 can be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00113.html (11,279 bytes)

98. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meters in the Pacific Northwest (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:43:11 -0600
People may need to be more careful, but the truth is this: if a station using computer logging wants to work what you believe is a dupe, then you aren't in their log for the first QSO. Ergo, work 'em
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00114.html (12,884 bytes)

99. [CQ-Contest] wanted: Contest Constable, first class (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Fri Feb 9 18:23:09 2001
f1A2NA927388 Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/cq-contest X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C World-renowned amateur radio organizatio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00076.html (7,902 bytes)

100. [CQ-Contest] Hello, this here frequency in use? (score: 1)
Author: ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca (Kelly Taylor)
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:16:43 2001
f274IQW04261 Sender: owner-cq-contest@contesting.com Precedence: bulk X-List-Info: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/cq-contest X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C FWIW, My only question is this: who spen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00089.html (9,461 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu