Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mts.net: 348 ]

Total 348 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [CQ-Contest] DUMB CUT NUMBER (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:55:05 -0600
It is possible to take "log what you hear" too literally, no? If that's the case, then perhaps we shouldn't translate Morse Code into alphanumeric characters, either. In SS Phone or ARRL DX, I am act
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00319.html (10,855 bytes)

242. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest and 2 kw (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:46:24 -0600
Hi all, Well, it certainly is interesting that a European station was sending 2k for a power, especially considering that the rules stipulate that power must not exceed 1500 watts PEP or the maximum
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00323.html (7,154 bytes)

243. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] DUMB CUT NUMBER (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:29:00 -0600
Rick, Steve is right in saying it's the responsibility of the sender to send in an easily understood format. You're right in saying that 5nn AK is NOT an easily understood format. At the current time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00351.html (8,377 bytes)

244. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] DUMB CUT NUMBER (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:30:39 -0600
Then NIL him. Enough people do that, guess who's not winning any contest. Was this one QSO worth blowing all the QSOs you wasted by haranguing him? 73, Kelly Ve4xt --Original Message-- From: cq-conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00352.html (11,262 bytes)

245. Re: [CQ-Contest] DUMB CUT NUMBER (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:12:01 -0600
The solutions to both the "check" and cut number pseudo-controversies are simple. Use Darwinism to solve the cut number problem: if you don't understand a poor choice in cut numbers and cannot get a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00388.html (11,448 bytes)

246. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to CAC (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:09:41 -0600
Hi all, Didn't this start with the actions of one station that Rick, K6VVA tried in vain to work? Are we going to toss the whole flavour of a contest over the action of one station? 73, Kelly Ve4xt -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00406.html (11,903 bytes)

247. Re: [CQ-Contest] Canadian Licensing (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 08:47:02 -0600
I would start at the Radio Amateurs of Canada website, www.rac.ca 73, Kelly Ve4xt W5WMU would like info on how he can obtain VE Licensing. Suggested books, testing information, etc. Thanks Charlie Ki
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00512.html (7,738 bytes)

248. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:02:22 -0600
So because one organization, who has control over nobody but those who enter its award program, decides on one rule, the rest of amateur radio must bend to its will? I doubt even the ARRL would agree
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00010.html (11,865 bytes)

249. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 23:31:11 -0600
That's exactly why all of my eQSL cards explicitly state "not valid for any award." It takes a little common sense rather that trying to "get away with something" like CQ is doing. Not sure I get thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00013.html (9,263 bytes)

250. [CQ-Contest] tr4w (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:17:25 -0600
Hi all, As a break from the tedium of solving all the world's problems by: -standardizing cut numbers, -admonishing CQ for publishing logs, -admonishing ARRL for having their bowels in a knot over CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00184.html (7,384 bytes)

251. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint QSY rule (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 21:13:23 -0600
The QSY rule is the one rule in contesting that really tests an operator's skill. You can't park on a frequency for a weekend and run rate. You're wrong when you say you cannot CQ. You can, for howev
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00201.html (9,467 bytes)

252. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:46:08 -0500
Unfortunately, this explanation makes as little sense as the original recommendation. If someone is predisposed to cheating on power, would he not also be predisposed to cheating by signing /QRP? A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00241.html (9,141 bytes)

253. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open logs in 2008 Russian DX Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:36:50 -0500
Here's why signing /QRP is a really bad idea: (using ARRL DX exchange only as an example) Ve4xt test DJ6RZ/garble DJ6RZ/? 599 k DJ6Rgarble/garble DJ6RZ/? DJ6RZ/garbleP And so on.... When I hear / I a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00256.html (12,722 bytes)

254. Re: [CQ-Contest] qrp-declaration... (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:15:39 -0500
Hi Chris, Glad to see I'm not alone in thinking the /qrp is a bad idea! I'm just curious, however: how does adding anything to either the call (the /qrp) or the exchange prevent cheating? A cheat wil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00269.html (8,831 bytes)

255. Re: [CQ-Contest] Get out of jail free card (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:00:22 -0500
As much as I have full and utmost respect for Jim and his abilities, I have to side with Ron on this one, not just for the reasons that Ron elucidates so well, but also for the fact that it amounts t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00278.html (12,770 bytes)

256. Re: [CQ-Contest] Get out of jail free card - SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:53:57 -0500
The level playing field argument has never really resonated with me, and here's why: Why is an operator who develops the ability to SO2R (and it is a skill, it's not plug-and-play) any different than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00349.html (9,907 bytes)

257. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:15:07 -0500
Why is the ability to build bigger and better antennas when you can live at or travel to the site a fair advantage and the ability to build the same antennas when you can only travel there virtually
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00418.html (10,160 bytes)

258. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:08:10 -0500
Hi Mike, You're reading a whole lot into this based on your own perceptions. I choose to read only what is there. If that's not good enough for the sponsor, they can clarify. The "address" bit was in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00449.html (16,215 bytes)

259. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re; Skimmer Ultimate Setup (score: 1)
Author: "Sandy Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:53:58 -0500
It's not that Skimmer is a piece of hardware in your shack that makes you assisted. Like someone once said, anyone who doens't mine their own silicon, germanium, manganese and copper to make their ow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00520.html (9,908 bytes)

260. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:50:19 -0500
Hi all, I agree that with some contests, there is a grey area regarding whether Skimmer constitutes assistance. However, there is no grey area, no splitting of hairs when it comes to CQ WW and WPX. B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00524.html (7,997 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu