Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve4xt@mts.net: 96 ]

Total 96 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Ham businesses, quads & IP (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 20:48:09 -0600
That's a good point, however I think that it's OK to realize that some technologies have become dated, no matter how excellent the customer support or how excellent the product. Quad antennas are exc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00121.html (12,573 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Making a self-supporting tower rotate (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:03:50 -0600
My big fear with a tower such as this is that instead of multiple weak links (ring rotors), where perhaps one antenna bites it, you have one big weak link that would make the whole assembly bite it.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00248.html (9,790 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Building Antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:32:13 -0600
Hi Bob, After 25 years in this game, I would disagree that there's been no change in antenna design. Yes, the fundamentals are inalterable. Folk who have tried to claim such are snake oil salesmen. M
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00296.html (16,055 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] UST HDX589 crank-up tower base on rock? (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:07:36 -0600
Hi Les, Get yourself over to trylon.com and check out their methods of anchoring freestanding towers to rock. I forget the exact dimension, but I think their rock anchors are 48 inches and they spec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00213.html (14,170 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor Stripping Gears? (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:09:55 -0600
This is all a very good argument for an Alfa-Spid style of controller: mast slips, adjust the controller. Period. No climbing. No pinning. No stripped gears. (At least until the slippage is, I think,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00014.html (9,935 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground rod connection: Cadweld or ???? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:47:05 -0500
Hi Bob, Cadwelding, once you know some of the tricks, is dead simple. Key things to remember are: 1. Matches or other simple flames will not ignite the material. It's deliberately designed such so th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-04/msg00404.html (12,006 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] Telex HyGain rotators (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 06:44:35 -0500
Hi all, Does a Ham-IV control box work on a Ham-II? Thanks and 73, Kelly ve4xt _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00153.html (6,285 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] self-supporting rohn 25g?? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:55:17 -0500
Hi all, I don't want to be critical of anyone, but am I getting correctly the sense that installation protocols for R25, if they don't already, should stipulate interim guys at intervals less than 30
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00181.html (11,229 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Helically wound verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 19:23:49 -0500
full-size 1/4WL radiator. Jerry Sevick may wish to disagree... Actually, he showed in the 1960s that short, loaded verticals are so close in efficiency to full 1/4-wl verticals as to be imperceptibl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00064.html (8,420 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] new AN-Wireless tower, floundaion question (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:45:38 -0500
The other consideration about undercutting for the pad is whether the concrete will fully form to the shape of the pad. I certainly wouldn't want to be in the hole forcing concrete into the undercut
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00724.html (12,309 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] High tension lines (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:20:33 -0500
An interesting tidbit of info: in Manitoba, transmission lines from generating stations to major centres are so long, they run them at DC, because at 60 Hz they'd be... resonant. 73, kelly ve4xt publ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00451.html (10,294 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Elevated Vertical with No Radials on Metal Roof (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:04:43 -0500
Hi Bob, Since nobody else seems interested in responding seriously to your question.... SteppIR and ZeroFive are correct: depending on the size of the roof (and for most average sized houses, it's fi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00544.html (10,601 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Beam Suggestions (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:04:54 -0500
If you know you're going to want a 3-el SteppIR, why not buy the 2-el SteppIR with plans to upgrade later? Buying the 2-el and then the 3-el upgrade kit later is going to cost more, but not as much a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00576.html (11,497 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] cheap hams (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:43:13 -0500
Hi Alan, I don't think careening from one extreme to the other helps the discussion at all. There are plenty of sturdy, capable tower installations made from decent used pieces that don't cost an arm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00588.html (8,440 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] cheap hams (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:22:40 -0500
Hi Jim, And even if you had intended to go beyond the wires in trees argument and suggest that it is not necessarily a second mortgage to put up a tower, that would have been OK too, in my book. I do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00618.html (10,803 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] cheap hams (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:37:57 -0500
Keith has put together a pretty good list, and for a Cadillac system at 70 feet, probably the definitive resource. But there remains plenty of hamming fun to be had at less than this, and that doesn'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00622.html (14,150 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Q Street Articles .. ?? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:57:02 -0500
I remember reading the QST reviews of the Maxcom unit. They trashed it pretty thoroughly. Even included X-ray photos showing the few components that were in the epoxy (resistors, coils) weren't conne
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00731.html (10,065 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Filling in anchor holes (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 12:15:24 -0500
Hi Dick, I'd worry that the backfill would, moreso than the undisturbed earth around it, leech out the water the concrete needs for curing. That would more than erase any benefit from preventing evap
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00295.html (8,407 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 meter vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:13:57 -0500
Sevick showed in the 1970s that if proper attention is paid to radials, loading and feedpoint impedance, shortened verticals can work very closely in performance to their full-size counterparts. One
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00926.html (11,013 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Building a "little pistol" contest station andtheC-31XR (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:33:45 -0500
Boy, if a C31XR is a little pistol, I guess we need to redefine what little pistol means... 73, kelly ve4xt -- Original Message -- From: "Andrew Roos" <Andrew.Roos@poynting.co.za> To: <towertalk@cont
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00192.html (13,661 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu