Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2up@comcast.net: 333 ]

Total 333 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Erroneous Ten Minute Violations (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:10:04 +0000
Considering how few DQs occur, I assume those that were DQed this year were fairly blatant and egregious in their misdeeds. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00272.html (10,827 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did'ja ever wonder? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:16:11 +0000
Why not change your section, too? Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00014.html (8,690 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:50:42 +0000
<sarcasm>Inspections are essential. After all, the stakes are very high. Big prizes, millions in endorsements, picture on a Wheaties box...</sarcasm> Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO ___
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00142.html (9,052 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Inspections (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:48:33 +0000
The Olympics is far from an amateur event. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00207.html (10,958 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why Are European Contesters Younger? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:33:59 +0000
Before my daughter started college she was in touch with a number of her future classmates via Facebook, IM, etc. One day she made the comment, "I'm finally going to meet the people I've been talking
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00380.html (10,993 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting age and lifespan (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:16:27 +0000
That's why Medicare is going broke. When LBJ started Medicare (eligibility age = 65) the average life expectancy was 64. Congress, in its infinite foresight, forgot to index it with future life expec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00418.html (9,818 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Special Announcement from 6Y1V (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:56:04 +0000
I applaud your efforts, but wonder if you going to let them submit the logs? Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00020.html (8,625 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW RTTY interesting rules (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 13:26:20 -0600
Perhaps it should be the other way around. The one point QSOs help equalize the inequities of the CQWW CW/SSB tests. For example, EU s get 2 pointers for QSOs a stone's throw away in another country
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-09/msg00165.html (11,233 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 2008 top scores on-line (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:36:05 -0600
Interesting that the DQs are prominently displayed at the top rather than in small print at the bottom... -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00030.html (8,584 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] q (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:57:37 -0600
I believe the main reason is the network would be overloaded with endless self-spots. In the old days, when the network was on Packet, that would have been a problem at 300 baud. Nowadays, at least f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-10/msg00283.html (7,578 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Deleted ARRL sections (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:48:45 -0700
Why was the NNY section created? Was is to create a "rare" section for contesting? Certainly population growth wasn't the reason. Did someone with significant influence at ARRL push for it, similar t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00153.html (11,784 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] How many CQWW "observers" were active during the contest? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 08:05:40 -0700
I noted in the writeups of CR3E and 8P5A that they had full-time observers present during their contest operation. How many others were there? Who pays for them? Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lake
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00143.html (7,365 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why do we like our favorite contesting mode? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:24:50 -0700
I guess it takes some people longer than others to realize that SSB contesting isn't fun, but most figure it out eventually :.) Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00017.html (8,811 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Origin of Cabrillo (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:14:45 -0700
I just got back from San Diego. I drove on the Cabrillo Pkwy yesterday. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00087.html (8,736 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut Number "J" - ASSISTED or MULTI? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:41:36 -0700
I had one station send his call /QRP. I logged it without the suffix. Barry W2UP (15m op at K0RF) -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00267.html (10,502 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] What Do You Do about US Stations Calling US in ARRL DX? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:08:32 -0700
I had about 5 US callers. I simply work them giving them the correct exchnage, not log them, and move on. Even if they don't get QST, if they're interested they can look up online what contest is goi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00303.html (10,121 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx cw spotting report (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:16:21 -0700
I wonder how productive that really is, as: 1. Many stations would log the ZD8, not bothering to listen for an ID. Was the LZ smart enough to ID with every QSO? and 2. It will generate many dupes. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00366.html (9,503 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? - Key Clicks (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:00:46 -0700
While you may be able to get within 200 Hz of the next run station with your shiny K3, don't forget that the guy on the other end probably doesn't have one. He has to be able to copy you, too. Barry
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00410.html (8,447 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - too much success? (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 18:29:12 -0700
Did you forget that the DX Cluster started and performed well for many years via Packet RADIO? Packet Radio died because of a superior technology. Those who don't adapt often go the way of the dinosa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00029.html (8,215 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Band Edges (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:13:30 -0700
With tongue in cheek, is this any different from doing 60 in a 55 MPH zone? Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Lakewood, CO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00104.html (8,651 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu