Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wf3h@comcast.net: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Moving to AZ (score: 1)
Author: "bob" <wf3h@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:34:24 -0000
Will soon be moving to Chandler/Phoenix area. Any info on tower restrictions? Most properties seem to be either small urban lots, or 'horse properties' (whatever they are). Info? Thanks all Bob/WF3H
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00067.html (6,629 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Good news about AZ tower restrictions in Pinal County (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:46:50 +0000
Just got a phone call from the zoning inspector in Queen Creek, AZ. Ham towers are exempt from any regulations at all. None. Zip. Not even a building permit required. This is HEAVEN! My last place in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00480.html (7,686 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Good news about AZ tower restrictions in Pinal County (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:06:02 +0000
This is good advice...my experience has been that if 2 local officials are involved, they will disagree with each other over everything. The XYL is an attorney, so may have her do the paperwork... Bo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00491.html (9,615 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Not so good news in Ocala,Florida (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:57:37 +0000
Although this is probably a topic for the ham/legal forum, you may have fallen into the grey area between too short (30' height restrictions), and the 'just right' (70' height) where alot of township
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00499.html (8,985 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Porqupines (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:14:24 +0000
I do recall being at the top of the Eiffel tower a few years ago and noticing the porcupines there. Amazing the things you notice in such a place...not that I was looking at the scenery. -- Original
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00564.html (9,827 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Just when I thought AZ was safe (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:16:20 +0000
We just put money down on a property and got a copy of the deed restrictions. Pinal County, AZ has no restrictions on ham towers, BUT the deed does have a CCR restricting tower height. However, there
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00884.html (7,757 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Restrictions (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:37:31 +0000
Here in the Phoenix area, property literally sells in hours. Only after making an offer...and waiting for a week or 2...do you get the CCR info. If you're prepared to wait months, while housing price
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00927.html (8,743 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Antennas - Need Input (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:32:03 +0000
I found the PRO67B to be excellent on 20 meters. It was good on 40, mainly because other folks were using dipoles. On 10 it was so-so. It survived a number of severe ice storms, was up 15 years with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00397.html (8,443 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Soil and Tiltover question (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 23:53:00 +0000
Looking at putting up a 50' tiltover Rohn 25 tower with a Pro 67B at the top (OK no snickering). The antenna weighs 100 lbs. Questions: 1. I live in S. Arizona desert. Soil quality will affect the ab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00604.html (7,163 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Guying a tiltover tower (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 19:34:10 +0000
I'm looking at erecting 70' of Rohn 25 with a Pro 67B at the top. This will have no thrust bearing, and the antenna will be <1 foot above the tower. I'd like to put up a tiltover, tilting from the ba
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00776.html (6,979 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Guying a tiltover tower (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 20:18:33 +0000
Thanks, everyone, for all the excellent responses on guying tiltovers....now, all that's left to do is making a decision! Bob/WF3H -- Original message -- _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00031.html (10,289 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Vatican Radio convicted for high cancer rates (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 17:05:32 +0000
At first I thought this was a joke, even it it's on the BBC website, but it's not. Vatican Radio officials have been convicted for causing cancer around the VR transmitter site: http://news.bbc.co.uk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00225.html (7,610 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 16:26:27 +0000
I had a Pro67B at 75' with a Ringo Ranger above that. My Ham IV lasted 15 years until I took it down last year...no problems at all. I had CATS put in the 'unbreakable' break. The system went thru ma
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00273.html (9,502 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Fellow Ham in Trouble (score: 1)
Author: "bob" <wf3h@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:12:29 -0400
I had to whip my local township into shape over this issue about 2 years ago. I reminded the township attorney that aesthetics were specifically forbidden to be used in deciding on providing a zoning
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00345.html (9,713 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Dallas area ham radio (score: 1)
Author: "bob" <wf3h@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:48:55 -0500
I may be moving to the Dallas Fort Worth area soon. Any good areas for ham radio? Areas to stay away from? Looking to put up a 70 foot tower and run the legal limit... thanks all Bob/WF3H ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00898.html (6,869 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] Big Bang (score: 1)
Author: "bob" <wf3h@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 15:51:20 -0500
Enough with this crap already. We scientists don't need to be lectured by the Christian Taliban about science. Let's leave Towertalk to talk about TOWERS. Thanks all Bob/WF3H Weather Stations", and l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00121.html (8,969 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Community Ordinances (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 23:09:35 +0000
We who live in TX are fortunate to have had this battle already fought on our behalf. When I lived in PA, my twp had a 35' height restriction. I summarized a number of cases, especially the recent on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00586.html (10,175 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] Feedline (score: 1)
Author: wf3h@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:07:28 +0000
OK I know this has the potential to open a can of worms, but I'm going to put up a nice tower about 100-200' from the station. I need a good feedline that is low loss and easy to work with. Hardline
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00271.html (7,093 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu