Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:xdavid@cis-broadband.com: 950 ]

Total 950 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [TowerTalk] Conductivity of cement (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:21:08 -0700
Actually, I think I was a bit skewed in my reply to Larry. Although I personally have no problem with connecting a rebar cage to ground outside of the concrete, Larry didn't actually suggest that the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00097.html (10,137 bytes)

222. [TowerTalk] Vertical vs Yagi (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:42:06 -0700
This whole thread illustrates the dangers of making generalizations. There are so many factors that affect antenna performance, even well constructed ones, that in my opinion it's not very objective
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00129.html (8,805 bytes)

223. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical vs Yagi (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 09:58:50 -0700
Sorry ... I missed that. I even searched through the archives to check, but apparently I overlooked Bill's post. 73, Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ ________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00135.html (8,497 bytes)

224. Re: [TowerTalk] Co-ax and Rotor Control cables inside PVC? (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 10:09:08 -0700
I'm not sure that the LMR400 would need it, but I've done the exact same thing for other cables (rotator control, etc). I wouldn't use thin wall PVC, though ... it generally has horrible UV performan
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00139.html (9,669 bytes)

225. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited. (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:39:07 -0700
Any chance that individual is willing to post said engineering analysis to his company's web site? It might be amusing to read. 73, Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ _________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00304.html (7,549 bytes)

226. [TowerTalk] Cage Dipole Performance (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:02:06 -0700
In response to N3OX's posting on cage dipoles, I searched around to find more information on them and happened to find the website of a manufacturer who also claimed better performance than a standar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00327.html (10,473 bytes)

227. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited. (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:52:06 -0700
Andy, I don't know how you arrived at that conclusion. It simply isn't true. Dbd "could" be referenced to a dipole in free space if so noted, but there is no convention that says it always is, or tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00382.html (13,092 bytes)

228. Re: [TowerTalk] Sloper or Inverted V (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:41:25 -0700
That statement hasn't been accurate for about three decades. Mechanical engineers now understand and can model exactly how bumblebees and hummingbirds fly. The only reason the myth lives on is becaus
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00632.html (8,509 bytes)

229. Re: [TowerTalk] Sloper or Inverted V (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:00:10 -0700
N3OX just corrected my flawed memory ... it was K4SAV who originally wrote that description of a half-sloper. My deepest apologies for the misquote. 73, Dave AB7E ____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00633.html (7,788 bytes)

230. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 Rusting (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:54:38 -0700
I agree. When I wanted to paint my heavily galvanized AN Wireless tower with a dark color for stealth reasons, KK3AN (the owner of the tower company) recommended I simply use a good exterior grade la
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00692.html (9,787 bytes)

231. Re: [TowerTalk] Stealth Paint ( was Rohn 25 Rusting) (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:30:31 -0700
For what it may be worth, the picture at the link below was taken roughly 300 feet distant from my tower. The tower is 70 feet tall, four feet across at the base tapering to about 20 inches across at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00703.html (10,459 bytes)

232. Re: [TowerTalk] NEC2 - Correcting for element taper on a loaded element? (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:00:09 -0700
I assume those modeling programs are the same as EZNEC since all three use the same NEC-2 engine, and EZNEC does not allow stepped diameter correction if you have loaded elements unless the load is a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00756.html (14,552 bytes)

233. Re: [TowerTalk] Compacted vs. Undisturbed Soil (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:19:40 -0700
I think that depends heavily on the type of soil involved, and how the soil is compacted. When I backfilled under the slab of my house (behind the six foot high retaining wall) I removed all rocks, l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00770.html (10,316 bytes)

234. Re: [TowerTalk] Utility Pole Weight (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 13:01:11 -0700
It's better to search on the pieces instead of the whole ... Wikipedia says that wooden utility poles are typically made from Douglas Fir or Jack Pine, among others. A Google search on <douglas fir d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00322.html (9,186 bytes)

235. Re: [TowerTalk] MACAntenna (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:47:59 -0700
That's like saying a 2 inch air gap is going to break down at the same voltage as a 1 inch air gap because the first inch will break down and then the second. And no, the voltage is a maximum at the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00387.html (8,980 bytes)

236. Re: [TowerTalk] MACAntenna (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 21:51:33 -0700
No it doesn't. The end is the end, and there isn't any current flow at the end of a wire ... unless you have arcing out into the air or something obscure like that.. Besides, he was clearly referring
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00394.html (11,197 bytes)

237. Re: [TowerTalk] MACAntenna (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:27:54 -0700
I give up ... Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00403.html (13,345 bytes)

238. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 - 80m "T" (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:27:46 -0700
I did a quick model of your proposed antenna with EZNEC assuming #14 wire and it said that you'd need about 52 uh to make the system resonate at 1.83 MHz. The resulting feedpoint impedance would be a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00443.html (9,470 bytes)

239. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 - 80m "T" (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:30:08 -0700
I also I got 45 uH if I assumed a 3 inch vertical element .... 73, Dave AB7E _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00444.html (10,217 bytes)

240. Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement (score: 1)
Author: <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:14:03 -0700
That's a very flawed comment. Reception is a function of signal-to-noise ratio, not absolute gain. People can hear great with all sorts of receiving antennas (small loops, beverages, etc) that make h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00032.html (9,451 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu