Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement

To: <k4ro.tcg@gmail.com>, "Towertalk e-Goups" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement
From: <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:14:03 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

That's a very flawed comment.  Reception is a function of signal-to-noise 
ratio, not absolute gain.  People can hear great with all sorts of receiving 
antennas (small loops, beverages, etc) that make horrible transmitting 
antennas.  I'll take Steve's actual field tests over your anecdotal reception 
reports any day.

73,
Dave   AB7E


------Original Mail------
From: "K4RO Kirk Pickering" <k4ro.tcg@gmail.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:40:02 -0500
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Multi-band HF antenna replacement


Here is a spot from last weekend.  Using a 19 year-old Mosley PRO-57A
antenna, I copied a European running 50 milli-Watts under world wide
DX contest conditions.

F5MUX         14035.9 K4RO       gd ears 50 mW here ;-)         2347 30 May

Good luck swimming through the perpetual hype and myth that surrounds
the HF antenna business. I know that Ward and Steve meant well, but
the number of data points is just too small to warrant the
declarations that Steve makes here several times a year. There are
lots of choices. Put up something you like, and have fun with it.

73  -Kirk  K4RO
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>