Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+4CX15000\s+Amp\.\?\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+4CX15000\s+Amp\.\?\?\?\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: RobertW@ewol.com (Robert W. Stankus); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 13:38:09 -0400; To all: What is going on here! Amplifiers with tubes that have handles! Come on now..lets level the playing field. There is no need to ever think of running that kind of power on our amateur bands. B; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00244.html (8,430 bytes)
2. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@connect.net (Phil Clements); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 13:39:44 -0500; dissipation >rating not to exceed 1500 watts. What about the RTTY and other digital mode users? Aren't they entitled to 1500 watts output also? I would think that a tube with a 3000 watt dissipation; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00245.html (9,203 bytes)
3. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 12:42:45 -0600; For the 1 millionth time, can we keep this reflectors discussion to the technical aspects of amplifiers. Take the FCC rule making QRM elsewhere. All we need is more Gov't regulations. Most of us don'; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00247.html (7,895 bytes)
4. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 14:00:58 -0500; Phil... I like your posts and you seem to be quite good at amplifiers. I disagree with your assessment of the 1500 watt mandatory tube plate dissapation rule. I think that is a novel idea to level t; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00248.html (9,131 bytes)
5. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: philk5pc@connect.net (Phil Clements); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 15:15:05 -0500; To: <amps@contesting.com> It also says to RTTY contesters to "run 750 watts." Oops!(playing field tilt) No, we certainly do not need tubes with handles, that is a little "over-kill!" I think an effec; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00250.html (9,215 bytes)
6. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: sm3lbn@swipnet.se (Hakan Ericsson); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 21:36:58 -0700; Good words Mike, I agree 100% Someone said a power limitation of a 3CX3000 could be ok, Well I remember when I was using a pair of 4CX250B's at 1200 Watt out almost 2,5 times the plate dissipation. O; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00251.html (8,602 bytes)
7. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: k1er@gte.net (John D. Peters); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 20:52:06 -0700; Amen. The 700 club reflector would be a good place for the rule givers to post. The station at NSS ran 16 15,000 Watt plate dissipation triodes. I think they were a 3C15,000 with 1 MegaWall output on; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00252.html (8,949 bytes)
8. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: Vince.Fedele@VSTTECH.COM (Vincent Fedele); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 17:07:37 -0400; C'mon Bob, put aside your badge for a moment. You forgot "power" as one of the key elements, along with skill, timing and antennas. Don't forget about other technology, such as packet interfaced to h; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00255.html (10,291 bytes)
9. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 97 16:11:16 -0800; Bob proposed: A 4E27 pentode is rated at 65w of anode/plate dissipation. The filament/cathode consumes 7.5a at 5V. The emissive capability is about 190mA in linear service.. A total anode dissipation; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00258.html (8,381 bytes)
10. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:23:48 -0400 (EDT); Kudos Bob! Get your lawyer working! Maybe more guys will start homebrewing amps, like the good ole days! Tetdrodes with handles for the homebrewer, I can see the headlines now........73 LOU -- FAQ on; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00266.html (7,771 bytes)
11. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:35:25 -0400 (EDT); Mike, Forget the FCC getting in on this, we have our share of DX COPS and RELECTOR COPS right here. As a matter of fact, the FCC is pushing for ham policeing of the rules! Check it out in QST this mo; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00267.html (8,168 bytes)
12. [AMPS] 4CX15000 Amp.???? (score: 1): Author: QROKING@aol.com (QROKING@aol.com); Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 00:44:45 -0400 (EDT); Great post John, but be prepared to take a beating for the 700 club crack! My eye is still swollen from a militant member of that group. 73 LOU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Su; /archives//html/Amps/1997-04/msg00268.html (7,705 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]