Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Bias\s+for\s+SB\-220\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+Bias\s+for\s+SB\-220\s*$/: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

41. [AMPS] Bias for SB-220 (score: 1): Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Fri, 4 Jun 99 09:11:07 -0500; Oops! I let the cat out of the bag! No, the ragechew only happens when SSTVers QRM me during a contest when I am several KCs away from their precious freqeuncy that they believe they own. The correc; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00119.html (9,118 bytes)
42. [AMPS] Bias for SB-220 (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 15:19:41 +0100; Sorry Tom, you're missing the point. My statement is that if you have a signal going into the PA and you switch the bias sharply, (we are assuming from cut off, by the way), then you'll effectively p; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00122.html (8,998 bytes)
43. [AMPS] Bias for SB-220 (score: 1): Author: Dick Green" <dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 10:24:33 -0400; ? You run VOX every time you talk on the telephone, Jon. As I recall, we conversed on the telephone. Huh? Telephone connections are full-duplex -- the channel is open all the time in both directions.; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00124.html (9,125 bytes)
44. [AMPS] Bias for SB-220 (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 15:37:34 +0100; Certainly with TDD, it sounds like full duplex. It actually isn't though, but it's not voice actuated either - the transmit slot time is there, and what gets transmitted depends on the system. In man; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00125.html (8,603 bytes)
45. [AMPS] Bias for SB-220 (score: 1): Author: montytaylor@texoma.net (Monty Taylor); Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 09:34:42 -0500; Dick is correct, but you must be thinking of using a half-duplex speakerphone. Depends on what instruments you two were utilizing during your telephone conversation!!! -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.conte; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00126.html (9,500 bytes)
46. [AMPS] Bias for SB-220 (score: 1): Author: nj4f@erols.com (Steve Bookout); Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 14:40:51 -0400; Obviously, you've never had a conversation by phone with my wife! 73 de Steve, NR4M -- Steve Bookout, NR4M (ex NJ4F) Rapidan Data Systems 'DX4WIN...The way logging programs should be!' Free demo at h; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00131.html (9,227 bytes)
47. [AMPS] Bias for SB-220 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 12:06:56 -0700; ? .Anything you say can be used against you. You have a right to remain silent. . (Miranda vs. Arizona (1966). ? There is no defined time interval. The overshoot pulse occurs after the charged ALC b; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00133.html (10,174 bytes)
48. [AMPS] Bias for SB-220 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 12:06:58 -0700; ? During my last telephone conversation with Mr. Rauch, after repeatedly assured him that I was Not tape-recording the conversation, he told me that he saw much parasitic-damage in the 400 SB-220s.t; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00134.html (8,711 bytes)
49. [AMPS] Bias for SB-220 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 12:06:52 -0700; ? Peter - - I find it hard to believe that running 5 or so mA of ZSAC is going to fully cure this particular distortion problem when the tube manufacturer recommends 75mA per bottle for linear opera; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00135.html (9,286 bytes)
50. [AMPS] Bias for SB-220 (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 12:06:54 -0700; ? I did not say that all kinds of splatter are produced. By listening to two receivers in stereo, tuned about 4kHz apart one can hear a spit-spit sound whenever the bias is in never-never-land. Alph; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00136.html (10,025 bytes)
51. [AMPS] Bias for SB-220 (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 11:58:39 -0400; Hi Peter, Please excuse my attempt at clearing this up. Rich's off-the-cuff condemnations and your response to them might confuse others into thinking ALL automatic bias systems are flawed. It is abs; /archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00144.html (10,513 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 51
Page: [1] [2] [3]