Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+FW\:\s+Mail\s+failure\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+FW\:\s+Mail\s+failure\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 09:02:30 -0500; Anybody know what this Mail Failure means? To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contes; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00011.html (11,711 bytes)
2. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com (Peter Chadwick); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 14:08:11 -0000; I suspect from the address is that someone at Motorola Government Electronics group (possibly in Phoenix) was a subscriber. There has been a change in e-mail addresses there, and the old ones bounce; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00012.html (7,987 bytes)
3. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 09:33:42 -0500; Boy, I guess there could be many reasons why this Mail Failure message appears - what do the reflector administrators want us to do if we see one? I had assumed that I was getting it alone but I supp; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00013.html (8,184 bytes)
4. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: phil@vaxxine.com (Phil T. (VE3OZZ)); Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 09:22:41; No idea Mike, but that's exactly the same one I'm getting too. Phil To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requ; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00015.html (12,817 bytes)
5. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 10:05:34 -0500; The well-behaved way for mail servers to work with reflectors (in my opinion) would be for bounces to go back to the reflector admin, rather than being directed all the way back to the message origin; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00018.html (8,404 bytes)
6. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: ah6oy@lava.net (Jim AH6OY); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 07:18:20 -1000; The Government e-mail allows a guy to go into the mail pick up area over in the Pentagaon for example and decide if you want the message to download and keep or just read it and reject the message as; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00024.html (9,086 bytes)
7. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: johnf@futurenet.co.za (John Fielding); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 18:59:36 +0200; Nope - keep getting it as well? John ZS5JF -- To: <amps@contesting.com> -- To: <amps@contesting.com> some continuing going http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesti; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00034.html (12,985 bytes)
8. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: mgilmer@gnlp.com (Gilmer, Mike); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 14:42:11 -0500; Yup - still getting it John To: <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQ; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00035.html (13,944 bytes)
9. [AMPS] FW: Mail failure (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 21:44:14 +0000; ...followed by 136 lines of quotes from previous messages. Did somebody mention unwanted messages? 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www; /archives//html/Amps/1999-02/msg00051.html (7,786 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]