Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+More\s+and\s+More\s+and\s+More\s+and\s+More\s+\-\s+drive\s+derived\s+screen\s+potential\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+More\s+and\s+More\s+and\s+More\s+and\s+More\s+\-\s+drive\s+derived\s+screen\s+potential\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Lamb); Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 21:28:12 -0800; Rich: You keeping adding new twists to assure failure. Your statement . "The DAF runs heavy grid current" is no more true than the statement that any grounded amplifier draws heavy current. At maximu; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00261.html (9,305 bytes)
2. [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson); Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 07:44:47 -0000; Distortion in Vacuum is a poor device However, he distortion. "the central parabola". The the top end of circuit may the peak. Hmmmmm - IF (big if) the combination of tube characteristics and drive; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00264.html (9,590 bytes)
3. [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: johnf@futurenet.co.za (John Fielding); Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 16:16:30 +0200; May I add my 2cents worth. Some causes of imd are not in fact due to the amplifier! In the G2DAF original circuit the impedance "seen" by the driver is approx. 300 ohms in order to develop sufficeint; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00274.html (13,435 bytes)
4. [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 08:36:19 -0700; We are discussing grid driven amplifiers. Normal grid driven linear amplifiers draw virtually zero grid current. GAF amplifiers are grid driven and they draw grid current. When the AB1 amplifier is; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00279.html (12,366 bytes)
5. [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: k7fm@teleport.com (Colin Lamb); Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 09:16:44 -0800; And if the power output was 20% higher than normal of the G2DAF design, that is a sign that the amplifier was overdriven. Since the plate efficiency is no different than the "standard" configuration,; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00282.html (9,625 bytes)
6. [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:24:23 -0700; With AB1, no grid current is permitted. With DAF grid current is permitted. When positive grid voltage is permitted, peak anode currents increase substantially. ? Not by DAF rules. By AB1 rules, yes; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00287.html (10,349 bytes)
7. SV: [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: harlins@swipnet.se (Lars Harlin); Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 22:37:27 +0100; AG6K: SM3BDZ: Its quite true that the DAF design permitts grid current. Thats why you should compare the design rather to GG than AB1. When a GG amp, or a AB1 amp, is driven to excessive grid current; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00290.html (10,482 bytes)
8. SV: [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 19:11:19 -0700; For linear operation, gain must remain constant. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrativ; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00296.html (10,225 bytes)
9. SV: [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 00:42:35 +0000; Only what G2DAF himself wrote (copy posted on my web site). All the rest has come from other people, and G2DAF is not around to pass comment. Actually, that's probably just as well for some people, b; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00304.html (10,998 bytes)
10. SV: [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: mike@g0mjw.freeserve.co.uk (G0MJW); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 09:48:51 -0000; You have an interesting definition of linear then. An "amplifier for SSB" may not demand constant gain, but by definition, a linear amplifier does. It also requires linear phase but I seldom see a p; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00309.html (10,483 bytes)
11. SV: [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 03:11:16 -0700; "I am not a crook". -- Richard Millhouse Nixon. - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00311.html (7,068 bytes)
12. SV: [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 03:11:15 -0700; ? It would have been my guess that DAF would be on a submission and domination trip. mercy! ? The only was I know to deal with S&D freaks is to be very certain of your stuff beforehand, do not parta; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00313.html (11,363 bytes)
13. SV: [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 03:16:33 -0700; Indeed, Mike, indeed. Rogers on that, good buddy. cheers, Mike - Rich..., 805.386.3734, www.vcnet.com/measures. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampsfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00314.html (10,431 bytes)
14. SV: [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: G3SEK@ifwtech.demon.co.uk (Ian White, G3SEK); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 16:55:50 +0000; Then your guess would have been wrong - which is not surprising since you never met him personally, or talked to or even heard him on the air. However... putting on my best Viennese accent and lighti; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00328.html (9,923 bytes)
15. SV: [AMPS] More and More and More and More - drive derived screen potential (score: 1): Author: measures@vcnet.com (measures); Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 15:12:36 -0700; ? You seemed to indicate that he was overly critical. Overcritical is usually an obfuscation of serious cracks in the foundation. . ? My impression is that it was His way or the highway. He was tryi; /archives//html/Amps/1999-12/msg00335.html (9,847 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]