Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+RE\:\s*$/: 155 ]

Total 155 documents matching your query.

81. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 98 13:00:35 -0500; How can you agree, Rich, when even you admit there is no such thing as a "non-inductive" resistor? Yes, you are correct here. I think what I hear you saying is that the inductance of the resistor is; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00191.html (8,372 bytes)
82. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 98 14:14:51 -0800; To create a resonance one needs capacitance (the anode-C) and inductance ( principally the leads between the anode and the tune-C). Resistors can be in the current path of a L-C resonant circuit, ho; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00193.html (8,996 bytes)
83. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Wed, 17 Jun 98 23:43:37 -0500; OK, I hate to pick, but ALL real components have Resistance, Capacitance and Inductance. So a metal film resistor with a spiral for the film will have inductance, plus there will capacitance between; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00195.html (8,348 bytes)
84. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 18 Jun 98 02:39:35 -0800; Film resistors whose film does not spiral have Inductance. And C between the end-caps. A resistor that has roughly 10nH of L and 1.5pF of C (the ones we use) resonate at 1200 MHz. Does it seem likel; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00197.html (8,735 bytes)
85. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Thu, 18 Jun 98 09:32:17 -0500; Did I ever say that? No. Someone questioned the fact that I stated that a resistor has a self resonant frequency. I have never claimed that it mattered in an HF amplifier. Also, I even stated in onc; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00200.html (8,252 bytes)
86. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: DAVED@ctilidar.com (Dave D'Epagnier); Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 08:47:48 -0600; I think you guys have sufficiently beaten the fecal matter out of a dead horse on this one (again). --Dave -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Admini; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00201.html (9,655 bytes)
87. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 18 Jun 98 07:49:33 -0800; The point was that the Rsup self-resonance is a non-issue. indeed true - and if the inductance of Rsup is equal to Lsup, the sup. design is wanting. -later, Jon Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734,; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00202.html (8,505 bytes)
88. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Thu, 18 Jun 98 07:58:33 -0800; ..... like watching coprophagous beetles? Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K, www.vcnet.com/measures -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Adm; /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00203.html (10,226 bytes)
89. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Wed, 6 May 98 04:58:16 -0800; ur welcome beats me, Alex cheers Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUES; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00067.html (8,259 bytes)
90. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 12 May 98 10:07:39 -0500; Why is our concern what load impedance the anode sees? IMHO, that load wil vary quite a bit over frequency. IMHO the load impedance is important only in so far as resonances are concerned. I also do; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00176.html (12,322 bytes)
91. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 12 May 98 09:27:17 -0800; Slander is the communication of false information. . . Info on Mr. Rauch is available in the grate parasitics debate archive on Will, KN6DV''s Web site. If it is gone, I can send you a text file of; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00179.html (9,840 bytes)
92. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 12 May 98 09:27:20 -0800; The average HF tank is a low-pass filter, so how does VHF-energy get past C-Tune? . - thanks cheers Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Su; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00180.html (8,003 bytes)
93. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 19:38:05 EDT; SNIPPED AMEN Arlen! Count me in. I've an acquaintence who's very good at I have several SB-220's here as part of my business. Also a fair amount of HP test equipment. Write up a test procedure and I; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00185.html (12,876 bytes)
94. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: Will KN6DV" <kn6dv@contesting.com (Will KN6DV); Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 00:02:26 +0100; --Original Message-- From: Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> To: Arlen Mendelssohn <pcmeas@hotmail.com>; amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: Tuesday, May 12, 1998; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00186.html (9,061 bytes)
95. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 12 May 98 19:34:17 -0500; I agree, Carl. I would be very interested in this. It would put to rest all of the "religion" that all of us experience with regard to this topic. However, I agree as you do that it would be difficu; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00187.html (11,078 bytes)
96. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 21:09:11 EDT; Very simple if you bothered to analyze a real circuit....not just theory. The SB-220 is a prime example of what you claim does not exist. 73 Carl KM1H ________________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00188.html (9,340 bytes)
97. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: km1h@juno.com (km1h@juno.com); Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 21:09:11 EDT; Welcome back Peter. You and ur dad sure did OK. I knew I would get a comment from someone as soon as I mentioned the 6L6. Unfortunately, too many of the current crop of engineers think that is some s; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00189.html (9,637 bytes)
98. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: jono@webspun.com (Jon Ogden); Date: Tue, 12 May 98 21:43:21 -0500; Ok, yes, I was talking a theoretical example. The "filter" could have a flyback where at higher frequencies the attenuation will actually start to degrade. Also, since no filter provides INFINITE at; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00190.html (10,576 bytes)
99. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 23:06:32 +0000; To: <amps@contesting.com> Hi Rich, And what are you? Do you really think name calling furthers your technical position? Can you copy, and post that comment? All we have is "your word". Not true Rich.; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00191.html (10,241 bytes)
100. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1): Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures); Date: Tue, 12 May 98 21:25:02 -0800; What is the real analysis, Carl? - thanks cheers Rich... R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative reque; /archives//html/Amps/1998-05/msg00193.html (9,036 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]