- 1. [AMPS] pi vs. t tuned input (score: 1)
- Author: nx7u@primenet.com (Scott Townley)
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 05:45:24
- About tuned input sections for amplifiers: Everybody and their dog seems to have an affinity for the pi-net type of tuned input. Is there some practical reason not to use a T-net? I was thinking of u
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00133.html (7,878 bytes)
- 2. [AMPS] pi vs. t tuned input (score: 1)
- Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 10:10:51 +0000
- To: <amps@contesting.com> Absolutely. When conduction angle is less than 360 degrees the tube generates harmonics in the cathode. In order to maintain efficiency and improve IMD, the cathode MUST see
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00136.html (8,585 bytes)
- 3. [AMPS] pi vs. t tuned input (score: 1)
- Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 98 08:13:41 -0800
- To: <amps@contesting.com> Agreed I have managed to saturate ferrite cores without causing them to overheat. How do I know the core was saturating? I could see the harmonic distortion on an oscillosc
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00139.html (7,918 bytes)
- 4. [AMPS] pi vs. t tuned input (score: 1)
- Author: DAVED@ctilidar.com (Dave D'Epagnier)
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:46:54 -0600
- -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.cont
- /archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00140.html (8,112 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu