Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AMPS\]\s+pi\s+vs\.\s+t\s+tuned\s+input\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [AMPS] pi vs. t tuned input (score: 1)
Author: nx7u@primenet.com (Scott Townley)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 05:45:24
About tuned input sections for amplifiers: Everybody and their dog seems to have an affinity for the pi-net type of tuned input. Is there some practical reason not to use a T-net? I was thinking of u
/archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00133.html (7,878 bytes)

2. [AMPS] pi vs. t tuned input (score: 1)
Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 10:10:51 +0000
To: <amps@contesting.com> Absolutely. When conduction angle is less than 360 degrees the tube generates harmonics in the cathode. In order to maintain efficiency and improve IMD, the cathode MUST see
/archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00136.html (8,585 bytes)

3. [AMPS] pi vs. t tuned input (score: 1)
Author: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 98 08:13:41 -0800
To: <amps@contesting.com> Agreed I have managed to saturate ferrite cores without causing them to overheat. How do I know the core was saturating? I could see the harmonic distortion on an oscillosc
/archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00139.html (7,918 bytes)

4. [AMPS] pi vs. t tuned input (score: 1)
Author: DAVED@ctilidar.com (Dave D'Epagnier)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 09:46:54 -0600
-- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com Search: http://www.cont
/archives//html/Amps/1998-06/msg00140.html (8,112 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu