Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+$Amps$\s+This\s+Reflector\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+$Amps$\s+This\s+Reflector\.\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] (Amps) This reflector. (score: 1): Author: "robert briggs" <vk3zl@bigpond.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:10:21 +1100; Well Don, it's a free world and if the "other" amps group is what spins your turbine then we guess that's where you should be. Bob VK3ZL.. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing; /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00223.html (6,662 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] (Amps) This Reflector. (score: 1): Author: jmltinc@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:36:07 -0400; Replies like this do not help the situation. If everyone who was unhappy with the situation on this Reflector left, there would only be be a small clique remaining, exchanging like views. The invitat; /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00238.html (8,068 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] (Amps) This Reflector. (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:09:57 -0400; John, I generally like to stay out of non-technical personal discussions, but here is something to think about. If a person has a valid technical point he is far more effective at making his point i; /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00241.html (9,025 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] (Amps) This reflector. (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:48:57 -0700; spins your turbine then we guess that's where you should be. I agree. I joined this list several years ago after nearly 50 years in ham radio with 100 watt radios. In response to BPL and increasingly; /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00249.html (8,278 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] (Amps) This reflector. (score: 1): Author: "k7rdx" <k7rdx@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:08:19 -0800; This reflector should (And does) reflect and share opinions and ideas of several designers,builders,etc..I have made several friends here and value their ideas and suggestions. The only semi complica; /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00253.html (9,996 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] (Amps) This reflector. (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:33:55 +0100 (CET); I would argue that although the quantity of material has reduced, the accuaracy of the technical information is vastly superior, being untainted by pseudo science or personal (arguably undefensible); /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00254.html (8,242 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] (Amps) This reflector. (score: 1): Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:30:35 -0500; On 20th March Peter wrote... "...there is, I feel, the problem that the books don't always agree, and neither are they necessarily readily understandable - even when they are right." ** It's really q; /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00255.html (9,025 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] (Amps) This Reflector. (score: 1): Author: JMLTINC@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:45:49 EDT; Tom, I won't debate what happened some time ago, particularly about "personal innuendo or attack" of which I agree completely. And what happened - happened. Right or wrong. When it did come down, som; /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00261.html (8,686 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] (Amps) This reflector. (score: 1): Author: JMLTINC@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:53:44 EDT; Jim, Is this group to now filter question it deems to be of a basic electronics nature? Who shall decide what topic or question is beneath his reflector and thus, not worthy of a reply? And who is so; /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00262.html (7,810 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]