Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+Re\:\s+SB200\s+loading\s+problem\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - Re: SB200 loading problem (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:25:49 -0700
It's not normal for the LOAD cap to be fully meshed on any band when operated into a 50 Ohm load. On 80m, a 500pF (I think) padder is switched in parallel with the tunable LOAD capacitor, but it's no
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00231.html (8,967 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - Re: SB200 loading problem (score: 1)
Author: John Parkins <kvp@bigfoot.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 06:32:02 +0100
Hello Steve, I had the same thought about 80 and the extra 'C' and changed it out for a new one, I also tried increasing it's value and checked the switch out but although everything was fine I still
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00234.html (7,800 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - Re: SB200 loading problem (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@ic24.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:19:04 +0100
You could see the same effect if the tank coil inductance is too low - eg if part of it was shorted out when it should be in circuit. Max load cap. gives you a high anode load resistance. The circuit
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00235.html (8,222 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - Re: SB200 loading problem (score: 1)
Author: John Parkins <kvp@bigfoot.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:42:05 +0100
Hello Steve, I was wondering about the tank coil although I've not noticed a problem with it visually, perhaps adding a turn or two?? The HT runs at 2100 off load and 1950 on load. As I've said in ot
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00236.html (8,425 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - Re: SB200 loading problem (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@ic24.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:02:13 +0100
Can't see a problem with trying it as an experiment - I'd been thinking along the lines of whether part of the coil was left shorted by the bandswitch. I don't know the amp, but from what I read that
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00237.html (9,672 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - Re: SB200 loading problem (score: 1)
Author: John Parkins <kvp@bigfoot.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:30:55 +0100
Hello Steve, Firstly Steve thanks for your help. The next time the thing is on the bench I'll maybe add a turn or two on the tank coil and see what happens. The anode current reads, for 500w out, 340
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00238.html (9,683 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - Re: SB200 loading problem (score: 1)
Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@ic24.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:10:09 +0100
Efficiency as high as 75% indicates heavy saturation, which ties up with the high anode load resistance. You will be getting higher gain, but at the expense of linearity and maximum output power. I'd
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00241.html (8,439 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - Re: SB200 loading problem (score: 1)
Author: John Parkins <kvp@bigfoot.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:55:10 +0100
Hello Steve, Well as I said I doubt the readings are accurate, given +/- 10% the efficiency could be in the 60-65% range and as it looks good on the scope it probably is. I'll note your comments thou
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00242.html (9,113 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - Re: SB200 loading problem (score: 1)
Author: "carl seyersdahl" <carlseye@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 19:37:46 -0400
I have been following this thread and have something to offer here. I can't think of why the loading problem , BUT, the hi voltage appears too low. Has it been measured with an external voltmeter?? I
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00244.html (12,552 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - Re: SB200 loading problem (score: 1)
Author: John Parkins <kvp@bigfoot.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:23:13 +0100
Hello Carl, Well the spec says the max volts on the anode should be 2400, so maybe Heathkit decided to save the valves a little. The HT supply has been re-built. My mistake next...... On the FT-1000M
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00253.html (10,458 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] [BULK] - Re: SB200 loading problem (score: 1)
Author: John Parkins <kvp@bigfoot.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:24:46 +0100
Hello Phil, I'll add it to the list of things to do next time the amp is on the bench, thanks. -- Best regards, John mailto:kvp@bigfoot.com _______________________________________________ Amps mailin
/archives//html/Amps/2005-09/msg00254.html (9,338 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu