Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\[ham_amplifiers\]\s+Re\:\s+Sensible\s+filter\s+Cap\s+sizing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+\[ham_amplifiers\]\s+Re\:\s+Sensible\s+filter\s+Cap\s+sizing\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] [ham_amplifiers] Re: Sensible filter Cap sizing (score: 1): Author: "Leigh Turner" <invertech@frontierisp.net.au>; Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 20:05:07 +0930; Nah Jim; although 60 uF is plenty adequate to achieve more than ample regulation and low ripple on the B+ plate supply, a 116 uF reservoir capacitance is at the upper limit of what I reckon is sensib; /archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00319.html (8,650 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] [ham_amplifiers] Re: Sensible filter Cap sizing (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 20:13:38 -0700; An amp that requires 3 kv @ 3A will require triple the C of an amp that requires 3 kv @ 1A. circuit fiasco, burned up torroids, the use of braided flex weave for tank coil taps, band switchs not stra; /archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00325.html (10,850 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] [ham_amplifiers] Re: Sensible filter Cap sizing (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 09:57:29 -0500; If I were homebrewing an amp I would not even bother with electrolytics; I'd use one or more oil caps to get 40 uF and call it a day. If the power supply is to supply a fairly static load, I'd use a; /archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00346.html (7,615 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]