Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+3CX1500A7\/8877\s+vs\s+el\s+cheapo\s+GS\-35B\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh Turner" <invertech@frontierisp.net.au>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:26:13 +0930
Good comments here Bob; you've nailed some relevant points here. The GS35B does indeed need a higher plate voltage / plate load impedance to achieve parity in efficiency with the 8877; complaining ab
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00403.html (9,403 bytes)

2. [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:32:14 -0700
Good comments here Bob; you've nailed some relevant points here. The GS35B does indeed need a higher plate voltage / plate load impedance to achieve parity in efficiency with the 8877; complaining ab
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00407.html (10,068 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:11:48 -0700
REPLY: "Splitting hairs"? If you call an extra 500 watts DC in to get the same RF out and almost double the drive "splitting hairs", then I guess so. 73, Bill W6WRT __________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00410.html (7,384 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:01:13 -0400
Or, consider re-buildable directly-heated cathode types that may, or already have, gone out of production, but where sufficient usage across industries will keep rebuilders like Econco and Zonum in b
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00417.html (8,017 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh Turner" <invertech@frontierisp.net.au>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:59:09 +0930
Hi Bill, But my point here was that if you design the tank circuit for a higher plate voltage and plate load impedance then you won't have to take a hit on the efficiency. As Jim reported in his repl
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00436.html (9,948 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 06:43:47 -0400
So the gain and efficiency go up but so does the cost of the PS and tank components. Use a good tube to start with, learn how to build fault circuits and enjoy life. I wouldnt want to be in the same
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00437.html (12,303 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:29:54 +0200
With the air variables most problems are with the rotor contacts, better to use split-stator but used as load capacitors they become too bulky. Two years ago I had a problem on 10m with the vacuum an
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00440.html (8,375 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:19:44 -0400
The OEP brand caps that most all the amp companies buy have always had poor rotor contacts. They now have 3 different levels of current handling but what Ive seen used is still the cheapest. Dont kno
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00443.html (10,435 bytes)

9. [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:22:59 -0700
So the gain and efficiency go up but so does the cost of the PS and tank components. Use a good tube to start with, learn how to build fault circuits and enjoy life. I wouldnt want to be in the same
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00445.html (10,019 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:25:47 -0700
REPLY: Achieving 61% efficiency is good enough, but at 4.1 kVDC you will be exceeding the manufacturer's ratings. The data sheet says absolute maximum instantaneous peak anode voltage is 6 kV and you
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00447.html (9,109 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:34:40 -0700
REPLY: I noticed the specs for the GS-35b don't specify a recommended CFM for cooling but they do say the maximum temp for cathode and grid leads is only 120 degrees C. That's pretty low compared to
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00448.html (8,689 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:36:52 -0700
REPLY: The only failures I've had with vacuum caps were of the glass type, leaking air. I'd stick with ceramic. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@c
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00449.html (8,451 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:29:16 -0700
REPLY: One neat thing about cooling a GS-35b is that a replacement glass for a Coleman lantern fits over it perfectly. Just glue the glass to the chassis with a few dabs of silicon RTV and you're rea
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00450.html (8,548 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:14:41 -0400
Physical Characteristics Envelope metal-ceramic Cooling forced air Minimum required Air flow 2500 l/min (83.3 cfm)** Diameter 100.2 mm max Length min 173 max 177mm (6.9") Anode Diameter min 99.7 max
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00451.html (10,959 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: MIKE DURKIN <patriot121@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:41:59 -0700
Well shoot .... I hit 94cfm ... and yea, its noisy. Im sure the fan noise is lower at 83cfm... _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00453.html (11,836 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: Alex Gavva <ur4ll@ur4ll.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:14:22 +0300
Hi All, It is Russian PA with 2 GS35b built by UA6HN in 1985: http://www.cqham.ru/foto/showphoto.php?photo=761&title=-d5-ce-d0-ce-d8-cecf-ce-cc-ce-c3-c0-cb&cat=500 It worked during 10 years without e
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00454.html (8,784 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:27:13 -0400
Fancy machine work, solder the filament leads to the tubes! Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00455.html (9,564 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:22:06 -0700
REPLY: How would you do that without exceeding the seal temperature? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00456.html (8,833 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: Steve Bookout <steve@dx4win.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:38:13 -0400
BIG iron, clean metal, flux, get in/get out. It would need to be almost instantaneous. Couple secs max. 73 de Steve, NR4M _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contes
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00458.html (9,391 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] 3CX1500A7/8877 vs el cheapo GS-35B (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:48:39 -0700
REPLY: Too risky for my taste. Make a clamp. Even alligator clips. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2012-07/msg00460.html (8,603 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu