Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+5\s+kw\s+amps\s+\-\-\s+why\?\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

21. RE: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: "George" <gclute@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:27:21 -0700
Yes Mike, we (TBTM) have provided Messr: Riley with the information in those letters, however the same offenders continue to show up and spew filthy language at the amateurs and the FCC daring them t
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00283.html (9,754 bytes)

22. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: Arthur Moe <kb7ww@easystreet.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 02:10:26 +0000
It has been asked before but here again. How fast will your car go ??? Faster than the speed limit right ??? Do you drive it at it's top speed ??? When you go up a steep hill are you glad you have th
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00284.html (9,966 bytes)

23. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:49:46 -0700
On Oct 19, 2004, at 10:12 AM, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ wrote: After reading a review in Eham today for the Emtron DX4 (2 4cx2500s) by an American ham, I have a question: Is there any kind of operating at t
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00287.html (9,366 bytes)

24. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:54:06 -0700
I bought this 195mph Ferrari because it has no heating problems at 65mph. On Oct 19, 2004, at 10:19 AM, Don Havlicek wrote: Key down at power limit, using RTTY, etc..... with no amp heating problems?
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00288.html (9,453 bytes)

25. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:58:52 -0700
On Oct 19, 2004, at 10:41 AM, Mike Manship wrote: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com> wrote:After reading a review in Eham today for the Emtron DX4 (2 4cx2500s) by an American ham, I have a quest
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00289.html (10,184 bytes)

26. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 06:09:41 -0700
On Oct 19, 2004, at 11:25 AM, Scott Manthe wrote: Some hams like plenty of headroom. ;) I know a guy who literally vaporized a legal limit balun on his dipole by accidentally running 85 watts into hi
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00292.html (11,221 bytes)

27. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 06:16:59 -0700
On Oct 19, 2004, at 11:36 AM, Bob Bruno - K2KI wrote: While I am not a proponant of over LL amps. You must admit it is fun to light up the flourescent lights in all the houses on your block. In my ex
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00293.html (9,805 bytes)

28. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 06:34:23 -0700
On Oct 19, 2004, at 11:44 AM, Barry Kirkwood wrote: Well, I manged to fry a "1500W " commercially made ferrite balun with significantly less than 1500kW out, let alone 3kW plus. The ferrite used in c
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00294.html (10,081 bytes)

29. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 06:49:37 -0700
On Oct 19, 2004, at 6:27 PM, George wrote: Yes Mike, we (TBTM) have provided Messr: Riley with the information in those letters, however the same offenders continue to show up and spew filthy languag
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00295.html (9,781 bytes)

30. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Manship <mjmanship@iquest.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:53:54 -0500
But sometimes a tube is just a tube. 73 de Mike W9OJ _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00296.html (9,573 bytes)

31. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Frenning, OZ1PIF" <oz1pif@privat.dk>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:08:43 +0200
Unlike beautiful women you CAN make a both beautiful AND usable Balun yourself - take a 35mm or bigger 4C65 core and a length of RG400 Coax; wind as many windings on the core as will fit (8 will do n
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00300.html (12,684 bytes)

32. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:30:21 -0400 (EDT)
You still get more dissipation out of a 4-1000A than a 12AU7. I believe R. Jeremy had a whitepaper about self oscillation. 73 Jason N1SU _______________________________________________ Amps mailing l
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00301.html (9,448 bytes)

33. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: Vic Rosenthal <vic@rakefet.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:38:51 -0700
R.Measures wrote: I bought this 195mph Ferrari because it has no heating problems at 65mph. That's not a good analogy, Rich. You bought the Ferrari because it can accelerate faster in the 0-85 MPH ra
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00302.html (9,041 bytes)

34. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: Will Matney <craxd1@ezwv.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:44:22 -0400
Was it R. Jeremy or J. Holmes? Cough...... Will Matney jsb@digistar.com wrote: On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Mike Manship wrote: - Indeed, Scott. I heard a woman comment that, in her experiences, guys who dri
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00303.html (10,356 bytes)

35. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: "lncarman" <lncarman@swbell.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:39:14 -0500
What happen to the good old days. Old timers engineered things to be dependable and long lasting. Double the rating on all the components and it last 10 times longer. Some of the border-line legal li
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00308.html (11,162 bytes)

36. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:22:38 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Unless you're a CB'er. All the same to them. :-) -- Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contest
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00309.html (9,535 bytes)

37. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:25:14 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Well, reading this reflector, for one. :-) -- Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.co
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00310.html (8,884 bytes)

38. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:27:10 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Three words: Context, context, context. -- Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com h
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00311.html (9,081 bytes)

39. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:33:14 -0700
On Oct 20, 2004, at 8:08 AM, Peter Frenning, OZ1PIF wrote: Unlike beautiful women you CAN make a both beautiful AND usable Balun yourself - take a 35mm or bigger 4C65 core and a length of RG400 Coax;
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00312.html (13,037 bytes)

40. Re: [Amps] 5 kw amps -- why? (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:41:32 -0700
On Oct 20, 2004, at 8:38 AM, Vic Rosenthal wrote: R.Measures wrote: I bought this 195mph Ferrari because it has no heating problems at 65mph. That's not a good analogy, Rich. You bought the Ferrari b
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00314.html (10,209 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]
This search system is powered by Namazu