Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Amps\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+31\,\s+Issue\s+60\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: w5grg <w5grg@comforttexas.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:16:57 -0500
How come people are discussing CB amps on this reflector? Is this thing FCC type accepted? I guess this list is one where it is ok to post ebay info. Thanks 73's George W5GRG ________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2005-07/msg00374.html (7,194 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: "Don Knight" <n4dek@triad.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:28:53 -0400
I didn't know it was against the law to discuss CB amps anywhere. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/am
/archives//html/Amps/2005-07/msg00376.html (7,958 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:32:07 -0700
Fortunately, unlike TowerTalk, this discussion group is not controlled by a control-freak. Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734. www.somis.org _______________________________________________ Amps
/archives//html/Amps/2005-07/msg00377.html (7,766 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: Tony King - W4ZT <amps@w4zt.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:39:54 -0400
Seems that Will brought the subject up because there are a lot of CB amps that are candidates for conversion to amateur service... not the other way around. Seems like a good way to put get into a mo
/archives//html/Amps/2005-07/msg00378.html (7,195 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: Dan <n9rla@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:08:02 -0500
I always refer to this as "rehabilitation"... 73 Dan -- K9ZF /R no budget Rover **QRP-l #1269 Check out the Rover Resource Page at: http://www.qsl.net/n9rla List Administrator for: InHam+grid-loc+ham
/archives//html/Amps/2005-07/msg00379.html (7,950 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:44:19 -0400
Tony, Amen! It seems some get uptight about the mere mention of using anything concerning 11 meters when the equipment is made the same as amateur equipment and/or can be readily adapted to it. I thi
/archives//html/Amps/2005-07/msg00380.html (9,548 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: "Dr. William J. Schmidt, II" <bill@wjschmidt.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:51:18 -0500
I see the conversion of CB amp to ham service as a type of philanthropy... It takes them out of CB service, and makes them useful as ham amps! They don't need to be type accepted because, for our pur
/archives//html/Amps/2005-07/msg00381.html (9,877 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: Tony King - W4ZT <amps@w4zt.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:07:52 -0400
Will, I would encourage you to re-join the ranks. Quitting doesn't make it better. It's what we do that makes a difference. If we want to listen, there will always be enough nay sayers to discourage
/archives//html/Amps/2005-07/msg00382.html (9,577 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 06:24:14 -0700
Indeed, Bill, and if one questions the bum dope they regurgitate, one is quite likely to get plumb throwed out -- especially if they are a drinkin' buddy of the moderator. TopBand is another such gro
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00002.html (8,181 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:12:55 EDT
Fortunately, unlike TowerTalk, this discussion group is not controlled by a control-freak. AMEN! Dennis O. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00003.html (7,000 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:25:49 -0400
OK, I have got to reply. Most of the hams that build amplifiers for 11 meter operators and those that know little about RF are illegal CBers that have taken the relative easy exams and gotten ham tic
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00004.html (10,990 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: "m.ford" <k1ern@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:21:27 -0400
I use my ham rigs outside the ham bands every day. I also exceed the legal ham power limit every day. I am required to hold a valid ham license to do so. Mike k1ern __________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00005.html (7,907 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:27:45 EDT
OK, I have got to reply. Most of the hams that build amplifiers for 11 meter operators and those that know little about RF are illegal CBers that have taken the relative easy exams and gotten ham tic
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00006.html (10,061 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 13:40:47 -0400
Bill, See Below; Bill, that happens every day whether we want to believe it or not. However, it's not quiet as bad now as it was as the old timers who were thick into it are long gone, or retired. Wh
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00007.html (17,411 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: Joe Isabella <n3ji@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
There is an event like this -- it's called "Vintage Field Day" and is around the first weekend in June. Of course, it's not a requirement to operate it, and I have been busy the last few, but my Viki
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00008.html (8,703 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:31:31 -0400
Dennis, I highly doubt there are just a small handfull of us that could construct a tubed piece of equipmet like a transceiver. There's only one US manufacturer I know of left making receiving type t
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00009.html (12,545 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:30:45 -0400
Will, since you no longer have a ham ticket, and dabbling in cb amps can't cause you to loose it. What was your old call and what years were you licensed ?? 73, John WA4TT ___________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00011.html (8,320 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 17:27:38 -0400
John, To be very honest, I only held a novice ticket for about two years around 1980-1982 I think it was or maybe a little after that. It's been so long, I cant even remember what my call sign was, e
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00012.html (11,582 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 16:43:13 -0500
It would be interesting to me to read the explanation for this seeming anomaly. The statements, as given, do not fit together, logically, (or legally.) Bill Bill Aycock - W4BSG Woodville, Alabama ___
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00013.html (8,535 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 31, Issue 60 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Smith" <wa6fgi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 15:11:17 -0700
I worked with a fellow who I tried to discourage he and his son from using ham gear on the 11 meter portion of the band. They got caught red-handed, I was accused (I did not) of snitching him out to
/archives//html/Amps/2005-08/msg00014.html (14,356 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu