Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Audio\/RF\s+compression\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Audio\/RF\s+compression\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:44:42 +1300; On 11/01/17 06:53, Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl> wrote: The problem with that is that 10dB of control range is far too small to accommodate the variations in the audio level coming from the; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00215.html (7,780 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 15:05:06 -0800; I agree with Steve -- having retired from a career in pro audio and broadcasting, I know quite a lot about audio processing. Manfred's description is requirements is wildly exaggerated, and Jim Thomp; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00216.html (9,397 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Christopher Brown <cbrown@woods.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:41:29 -0900; Given that most radios don't have all of this built in, or at least a poor version the critical question in my mind is... Is there a good single box to do this on and is there anything available that; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00217.html (10,503 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: "Fern Rivard" <crc@cyberlink.ca>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:07:21 -0700; Get a hold of a Drake SP-75 speech processor. It will work with any rig and works very well. It also has a noise gate. Fern VE7GZ Given that most radios don't have all of this built in, or at least a; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00220.html (11,222 bytes)
5. [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:54:03 -0800; Given that most radios don't have all of this built in, or at least a poor version the critical question in my mind is... Is there a good single box to do this on and is there anything available that; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00228.html (9,663 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:05:27 -0600; Not 12 volt powered, but for two different radios ............. http://www.bswusa.com/Compressors-and-Limiters-Behringer-MDX2600-P9648.aspx They make a four channel for four radios. Don W4DNR Given t; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00230.html (8,278 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:54:30 -0600; How about "Voice Shaper" https://youtu.be/VpiIqWhXbqk Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 1/11/2017 9:54 AM, Jim Thomson wrote: Date: Tu; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00231.html (10,627 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:07:46 +0000; Chris, Jim, and all, in addition to various circuitry that performs audio processing at varying levels of versatility, quality, and cost, we should not forget the possibility to do it in software. Al; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00232.html (10,776 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:04:03 -0800; Yes, certainly a possibility. But have you looked at latency? This may or may not be a problem. Another question though. What's your ham call? How much operating do you do? What sort of operating do; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00233.html (8,528 bytes)
10. [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:50:09 -0800; Yes, certainly a possibility. But have you looked at latency? This may or may not be a problem. Another question though. What's your ham call? How much operating do you do? What sort of operating do; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00235.html (9,573 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:28:50 -0800; trying to monitor urself with headphones on. The degree of latency that can be tolerated also depends on what sort of operation you're doing. 100 msec is fine for ragchewing, but may start to be a pr; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00236.html (9,040 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Paul Baldock <paul@paulbaldock.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:32:07 -0800; Yes, certainly a possibility. But have you looked at latency? This may or may not be a problem. Definitely a problem if you monitor your audio in the headphones, which I do 100% - Paul ______________; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00237.html (8,910 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Paul Baldock <paul@paulbaldock.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:33:10 -0800; Yes, certainly a possibility. But have you looked at latency? This may or may not be a problem. Definitely a problem if you monitor your audio in the headphones, which I do 100% - Paul ______________; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00238.html (8,340 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:51:34 -0500; Delays of over 100 ms begin to become distracting. It is a matter of the user's ("talent" for broadcasters) ability to handle distraction. However in my experience, even the most skilled "talent" fel; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00239.html (9,859 bytes)
15. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:13:22 -0800; YES! One thing I did a LOT of was providing sound for large events both indoors and outdoors. In such systems, the acoustic travel time between loudspeaker and listener typically ranges from as littl; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00240.html (10,805 bytes)
16. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:59:09 -0500; Latency becomes an issue when main loudspeakers are 30+ feet over a stage and further displaced side to side, and spill sound to the stage, often in the range of 30-40 msec. This drives musicians nu; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00242.html (10,382 bytes)
17. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Mark - G4FPH <g4fph@mjha.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 21:46:49 +0000; We're very lucky in my part of UK to have access to a number of WebSDR receivers (ref. www.websdr.org) that cover the 160 and 80 metre bands that I most often use. When ragchewing on SSB, I have move; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00245.html (12,798 bytes)
18. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Bryan Swadener via Amps <amps@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:02:00 +0000 (UTC); I tried software but, latency was horrid. That is why I use a Symetrix 528E 'Voice Processor'. In a 1U box, you get an excellent preamp, de-esser, expander, limiter/compressor, and three band paramet; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00246.html (10,057 bytes)
19. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: "Ken Durand" <N4zed@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:02:47 -0500; I've been using WebSDR for over a year now....great service. When running a net on 75 meters you can watch the propagation change over the course of a couple of hours in the early morning. I'm on the; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00248.html (14,547 bytes)
20. Re: [Amps] Audio/RF compression (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:03:17 -0800; Yes, Symetrix is a great pro audio company. I used to specify their gain-riding AGC units in front of the hearing impaired transmission systems that were part of the sound systems that I designed. In; /archives//html/Amps/2017-01/msg00249.html (9,176 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]