Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+CB\s+amps\s+on\s+e\-Bay\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+CB\s+amps\s+on\s+e\-Bay\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: n1rj@pivot.net (Roger D. Johnson); Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 20:34:32 -0400; I've noticed a bunch of obvious CB amps for auction on e-Bay. I've been going through the FCC regs trying to find an easy way for a non-ham to tell the difference between a legal "ham" amp and one of; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00407.html (7,894 bytes)
2. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: n8de@thepoint.net (Don Havlicek); Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:37:51 -0400; All 'homebrew' amplifiers are OK to the FCC .. but, 'manufactured amplifiers' [including KITS] for operation below 144 mHz require 'certification'. The FCC website for ALL 'certificated' amplifiers i; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00412.html (9,085 bytes)
3. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: jstrohm@texas.net (Jim Strohm); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:50:52 -0500; "Roger D. Johnson" <n1rj@pivot.net> says -- I've seen some post-1978 CB amps bearing an obviously bogus label stating "Certified according to FCC regulations effective 28 April 1978" or something lik; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00415.html (9,207 bytes)
4. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:41:38 EDT; A friend on mine (W8FAX) and I (both Hams) recently sent e-mails to eBay complaining about the CB amps and got them removed. This is only a temporary fix as the culprit changes his screen name and re; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00419.html (9,640 bytes)
5. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: w3lap@america.net (Jim Thompson - W3LAP); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:30:55 -0400; Jim Strohm Please just keep your windows buttoned up at 902 SAVANNA LN and leave well enough alone. Where did you get your start - CB band. YES. Those guys and girls on the cb band are not harming yo; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00421.html (10,318 bytes)
6. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:56:35 -0700; W3LAP: Not harming us? Indeed they are. Here's how: -CBers causing RFI/TVI in residential neighborhoods. Ham applies for permit to erect a tower and is denied because the neighbors, who have experien; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00424.html (12,894 bytes)
7. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:36:51 -0700 (PDT); Hear Hear! __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00426.html (14,407 bytes)
8. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 09:38:39 -0700 (PDT); You're wrong Jim, The CBer's with amps might not hurt anybody if they stayed in the CB band. But they don't. You must not operate 10 meter CW or you would know that. It is damned difficult to work DX; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00427.html (14,573 bytes)
9. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 10:05:18 -0700; The post from W3LAP also postulated that we all got our start in CB. Obviously, hams licensed prior to 1957 didn't, since CB didn't exist. I got my start 8 years after that, when CB was in full bloom; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00429.html (16,273 bytes)
10. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: jstrohm@texas.net (Jim Strohm); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:02:29 -0500; Thompson, you can KEEP your two cents, because money like yours isn't any good in this part of America. As a matter of fact, I *did* get my start on CB. 99% of the CBers I used to know ran cleaner st; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00430.html (11,206 bytes)
11. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: larbot@jorsm.com (Larry Botkin); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:44:59 -0500; It really made a lot of sense to provide a street address of someone you disagree with... Is that supposed to be a threat ? If it is, I feel you are pushing the envelope quite a bit. And it is remini; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00431.html (11,731 bytes)
12. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: mandolinist@interlync.com (Gary Smith); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:53:40 -0500; Heh, There's a picture of me on a chair at 2 years old with my feet 8" from the floor talking into my dad's mic on his homebrew station (circa 52). But I had a CB walkie talkie before I got my ham ti; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00432.html (18,042 bytes)
13. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: w8ron@stratos.net (Ron); Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 03:45:50 -0400; Actually , I had my petition to the zoning board of Cleveland denied to allow me to construct a 50 ft tower instead of a 35 ft that is currently allowed. One of the Black board members had a foul mou; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00434.html (14,996 bytes)
14. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: w8ron@stratos.net (Ron); Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 03:54:26 -0400; When the amps are outlawed , Hams will start building them in their garages and sell them making great profits. There are hundreds of hams doing this and also many making the 10KW + amps for themselv; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00436.html (14,515 bytes)
15. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: w8ron@stratos.net (Ron); Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 04:08:27 -0400; Like it or not Steve, the lion share of Hams are coming from the CB band as I told you before. Their numbers carry significant weight and the ARRL as well as other groups will depend on their numbers; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00437.html (9,232 bytes)
16. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: stevek@jmr.com (Steve Katz); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:19:34 -0700; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00438.html (10,032 bytes)
17. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: wa5jci@flash.net (WA5JCI); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:00:37 -0500; most I just worked, at 1908Z, FO3BM on 6 meters from East Texas, doesn't get better than that! es 73 de Pete WA5JCI 6 Mtr VUCC#361/781 Confirmed--2 Mtr VUCC#346/190 Confirmed 6 Mtr WAS#490--6 Mtr DX; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00439.html (8,734 bytes)
18. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: wy6k@yahoo.com (WYsixK); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:48:26 -0700 (PDT); Again, all of that is beside the point. No one in this thread is picking on CBers. We are picking on CBers who operate illegally. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yah; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00441.html (10,261 bytes)
19. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: Wt8r@aol.com (Wt8r@aol.com); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:47:36 EDT; Please be advised of some information re w3lap: Jim F. Thompson, W3LAP Route 6 Box 450 Cochran, GA 31014 USA Vanity call. License Class: Technician To: <amps@contesting.com> License Issue/Renewal Dat; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00449.html (8,637 bytes)
20. [Amps] CB amps on e-Bay (score: 1): Author: k6ndv@contesting.com (Will); Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:19:23 -0700; Hello all, well it has been a while but got to do it, please lets go back to AMPS......we have been on this subject already a few times and it always ends up the same. Thanks a bunch. 73 Will, K6ND(V; /archives//html/Amps/2002-04/msg00450.html (9,350 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]