Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Clean\s+\-vs\-\s+Unclean\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Clean\s+\-vs\-\s+Unclean\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:10:07 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sorry. Too many FT-1000 radios out there. :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@co; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00308.html (8,276 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean (score: 1): Author: "k0dan" <k0dan@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:15:19 -0600; Hi Tom... Not sure this will give you the path you need, but the MP (I don't have a MK-V but think they're the same in this respect?) has an A/B ant RX port. It's intended to allow use of Beverage or; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00309.html (11,050 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:05:16 -0800; I know a Ham in North Hollywood who modified his radio to Increase IMD - apparently so he could get more negative attention. Different strokes for different folks. Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00314.html (9,500 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:47:29 -0800; The TS-830S is the only radio I have ever heard that goes from little or no copy to fair copy by switching it's RF Processor on. It is also the best sounding processor I've heard. Richard L. Measures; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00316.html (9,638 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:09:38 -0800; A rig that is designed for serious contesting needs a Class-A(amiable) position for friendly chatting between contests, and a Class-C(contesting) position to blast a hole. Richard L. Measures, AG6K,; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00319.html (11,157 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:09:36 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ As always, Richard cuts to the heart of the matter. :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing li; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00321.html (9,303 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean (score: 1): Author: "Ivan Makarov" <left@rogers.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:37:27 -0500; Tom, Keep the sub receiver bpf just in case. I believe true dual RX capability is possible for the Mark V/Field models. I am in process of finalizing a design that will bring dual band reception feat; /archives//html/Amps/2006-01/msg00332.html (10,568 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 27
Page: [1] [2]