Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Flash\s+arcs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Flash\s+arcs\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] flash arcs (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:55:10 +0200 (CEST); According to Gossling's paper in the Journal of the IEE (which means it was certainly peer reviewed!), flash arcs is slightly affected by residual gas: the 'clean up' effect of the arc can lower the; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01152.html (7,032 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] flash arcs (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:12:34 -0400; That's exactly the type of damage I have seen. As I posted earlier, 3-500z's generally mark the grid support cone at the bottom with very fine lines. 73 Tom _________________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01155.html (7,383 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] flash arcs (score: 1): Author: R L Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:08:44 -0700; Since the top of the grid cone is closer to the anode than the bottom is, why wouldn't the arc take place at the shorter distance? R L MEASURES, AG6K. 805-386-3734 r@somis.org _______________________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01204.html (8,095 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] flash arcs (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:59:21 -0700; Which "Journal of the IEEE" are we talking about? IEEE Spectrum is NOT peer reviewed, and there have been some significant complaints about stuff with questionable science published in it. Jim Brown; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01206.html (7,409 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] flash arcs (score: 1): Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 23:12:59 -0400; Jim, That post didn't come from me! I don't know a thing about Gossling's paper. So Tom W8JI didn't write it, someone else must have. 73 Tom _______________________________________________ Amps mail; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01207.html (7,397 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] flash arcs (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 21:07:31 -0700; Per google: B.S. Gossling, "Flash Arc in High Power Valves", J.Inst.Elec.Engrs.(London) 1932 Vol. 71, p460-487 BTW, you are right, Jim. "IEEE Spectrum" is not peer reviewed, but it is a magazine not; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01208.html (7,910 bytes)
7. [Amps] Flash arcs (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:41:03 +0200 (CEST); Never said a word about the IEEE. In the 1850's there was set up in London a 'Society of Electricians'. In the 1860's or thereabouts, they became the 'Institution of Telegraph Engineers', and at some; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01214.html (7,886 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] Flash arcs (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:01:16 -0700; Indeed there are! I didn't mean to be parochial, only saw the post as a typo for IEEE. I serve on the AES Standards Committee with some excellent engineers from around the world, including Germany, S; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01219.html (7,544 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] Flash arcs (score: 1): Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:51:07 +0200 (CEST); Will, The IEEE have the best magazines (I refer to them rudely as comics) though - the Journals of the Solid State Circuits and Antennas and Propagation societies are the ones I take. 73 Peter G3RZP; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01222.html (7,646 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] Flash arcs (score: 1): Author: "Will Matney" <craxd1@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:34:47 -0400; Peter, If you ask me, the Europeans are a little smarter in some respects. At least they had the sense to call a tube a valve. They named it for the way it actually works, not how it looks! Best, Wil; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01224.html (9,322 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] Flash arcs (score: 1): Author: "Mike K6BR" <noddie@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:04:32 -0700; I have always thought that valve was a better a description, but then I am British, not European :) Mike K6BR G0EYI Peter, If you ask me, the Europeans are a little smarter in some respects. At least; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01226.html (9,637 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] Flash arcs (score: 1): Author: Martin Sole <msole@loxinfo.co.th>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:41:40 +0700; I vote for valve as well, and anode, and heater. I have always wondered about grid since it does seem to suggest what it looks like rather than what it does. I presume from Mike's second call that he; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01228.html (9,814 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] Flash arcs (score: 1): Author: "Steve Thompson" <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:40:33 +0100; Be careful - he might be a Scot (or Welshman or Irishman) living in England. It can be dangerous labelling them (or someone from Cornwall) as being English! Steve (nearly all English) _______________; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01229.html (8,216 bytes)
14. Re: [Amps] Flash arcs (score: 1): Author: "Jim Tonne" <tonne@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:31:22 -0400; How about emitter, and gate, and collector? :-) - Jim WB6BLD _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2006-07/msg01235.html (7,894 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]