Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+GBR\s+and\s+radiation\s+exposure\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+GBR\s+and\s+radiation\s+exposure\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] GBR and radiation exposure (score: 1): Author: "John Nelson" <john@crew-green.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:16:38 +0100; years and so far there does no appear to be any 'peculiarity' among the staff who worked there.< Not a good example, since although it may have run 2MW into the antenna, the efficiency of such an el; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00220.html (7,662 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] GBR and radiation exposure (score: 1): Author: peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:44:28 +0200; My father in law spent many years working at the big stations at Rugby (new - 30kW HF tx's) and old - the GBR site with a few 100kW tx's, at Leafield with lots of QRO HF, and on the tropo scatter lin; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00221.html (7,227 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] GBR and radiation exposure (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:48:14 -0700; Chortle. It seems to me that the wavelength of the radiation one is exposed to would be a factor. For example, persons whose height is c. 3-meters should probably not run high-power on the 6m band. c; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00222.html (8,112 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] GBR and radiation exposure (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@ic24.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:05:25 +0100; Sounds a familiar trait. I spent a while working on development of radar stuff, many MW pulse, 10s kW average. There was a certain insanity about the longer standing members of the team - I'm not ce; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00223.html (7,683 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] GBR and radiation exposure (score: 1): Author: peter.chadwick@Zarlink.Com; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:16:16 +0200; 140kV It's much more likely that it was the result of years of UK management style - that's enough to drive anyone crazy. 73 Peter SM/G3RZP _______________________________________________ Amps mailin; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00224.html (7,542 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] GBR and radiation exposure (score: 1): Author: Vic Rosenthal <vic@rakefet.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 07:51:48 -0700; John Nelson wrote: HF broadcast sites run a lot of ERP and the field strength at ground level can be very high in certain areas. However, BBC transmitter engineers seem to live long and happy lives.; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00229.html (8,106 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] GBR and radiation exposure (score: 1): Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:30:20 -0700; On Aug 20, 2004, at 7:51 AM, Vic Rosenthal wrote: John Nelson wrote: HF broadcast sites run a lot of ERP and the field strength at ground level can be very high in certain areas. However, BBC transmi; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00231.html (9,160 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] GBR and radiation exposure (score: 1): Author: "donii@sympatico.ca" <donii@sympatico.ca>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:28:38 -0400; Dear Peter RE: Radiation and beer. Its quite simple: you develop a taste for beer because it protects your body from rf radiation. Its a well keep state secret but if ever we wage war with rf weapons; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00238.html (7,851 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] GBR and radiation exposure (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:24:50 -0400 (EDT); Were your ears burning? heh goofy chuckles, Jason N1SU _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00241.html (8,292 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]