Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+I\s+dont\s+accept\s+answers\s+to\s+why\s+did\s+Heath\s+die\?\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 02:28:36 +0000
Sorry, but I do not accept the answers to why there are no more ham Heathkits, at least today. Today, hams are hungry for a safe and sure building projects which 1. includes all all all the parts, 2.
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00622.html (10,876 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: jeff millar <jeff@wa1hco.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:49:56 -0500
Superb kits do exist... - Cheaper than commercial (by _far_) - Better performance - More advanced technically than a rice box - Significant learning experience - Compatible with entry level or kids h
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00623.html (11,406 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:58:33 -0800 (PST)
There are some kits available, usually fairly simple, but there are a couple complex ones out there. But, Heath's "bread and butter" was NOT amateur radio although, for decades, amateur radio equipme
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00632.html (12,669 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:06:01 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: One more reason not mentioned so far is the cost of customer support. When the kit is built and doesn't work, the phone calls begin, not to mention the possibility of shippin
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00634.html (10,195 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:29:54 -0500
And contrary to what some believe the demand just isn't there. Sure there are some, maybe even groups that would like to build some kits. Still...few of us want to build the same thing so the kit lin
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00640.html (15,473 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:43:53 -0500
They used to tell the story of a guy who did a beautiful job of construction on a kit. It was a work of art, but it didn't work. As I understand it had a lot of techs scratching their heads. Then som
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00641.html (11,026 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: "David H Craig" <davidhcraig@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:07:27 -0500
As an attorney, I could not have said it better than Glen did (save the mine, wire & power-company thing- thr latter are "usually" immune). Money-hungry, greedy, J.D. BSTRDs are at the root of the pr
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00643.html (14,020 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: "Fuqua, Bill L" <wlfuqu00@uky.edu>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 02:13:52 -0500
Elecraft can only stay around for two reasons, the first the owner(s) and employees must have a passion for amateur radio and the second is that there is little competition. If there were more amateu
/archives//html/Amps/2010-01/msg00647.html (11,990 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:25:04 -0500
I have a good example, I sent off for a large Heath transistor tester over 40 years ago. Upon examination one of the rotary switches (there are two rows, next to the meter and others) did not match
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00009.html (8,220 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:15:16 -0500
The Elecraft K-3 is an example of what kits have become. Ten Tec also has a selection of less complicated ones. Down East Microwave has some rather elaborate ones for the VHF and up bands. Then there
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00011.html (11,761 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 07:56:36 -0800 (PST)
Of course I was being facetious with all of the people that would be sued. But, again, I wouldn't put it past someone attempting to sue that far down the "food chain"! A good friend of mine is listed
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00013.html (8,635 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Scott McGrath <mcgrath@fas.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:43:18 -0500
In a word Zenith, Heath would probably still be around if Zenith had not purchased them for the Heath computer products line, And as per usual the Zenith guys who were consumer products guys could no
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00014.html (16,700 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Frank T Brady <franktbrady@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:57:13 -0500
I wonder if the software radios are comparable to the K-3? If so, isn't SDR the least likely to become obsolete. Has anyone discussed the performance differences between the two radios? Also, how muc
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00016.html (8,755 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Dawson" <jdawson@jasystems.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:29:25 -0600
I recently became excited about the Flex-5000 but after reading a bunch of comments about it's poor performance with sending CW because of latency, I have cooled my enthusiasm. I wonder if the softwa
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00019.html (9,428 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Dave White <mausoptik@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:48:38 +0100
I know that there's huge interest in using the K2/K3 as the RF side of an SDR but know very little about it. Julian G4ILO and Ron PE8E could advise further. I think that both are experimenting with b
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00020.html (8,959 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Frank T Brady <franktbrady@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:54:41 -0500
Jim, That's the first I've heard of latency problems. This is why I was hoping to get some discussion going, because K3 and SDR owners are invariably sold on their eqpt but haven't compared the two.
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00021.html (8,310 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:59:01 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Some Windows programs have the same problem. One sure cure is to use WinKey if the Flex software supports it. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ A
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00022.html (9,858 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Frank T Brady <franktbrady@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:04:46 -0500
Thanks Phil, K3 + LP-Pan+SDR sounds like a $5000+ transceiver. It's hard to tell how much of each is actually being used. From my perspective, I'm trying to decide which approx $2500 solution will ha
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00023.html (9,461 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Barber <audioguy@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:14:31 -0800
Latency with the Flex may or may not be a problem depending on the PC and the care used to configure it. I make no claim to being a CW op, so it would be better to have the discussion with someone th
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00025.html (11,377 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] I dont accept answers to why did Heath die? (score: 1)
Author: Frank T Brady <franktbrady@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:14:34 -0500
Bill, I browsed the WinKey site and it didn't pop right out as to how/why WinKey solves SDR latency. Could you expand on that just a little? tx frank w0ecs ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2010-02/msg00026.html (10,346 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu