Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+Need\s+for\s+bias\s+switch\s+\(CW\/SSB\)\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie@drhabekost.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:16:58 -0800
Folks I am putting a 8877 amp together. I was wondering why some amps have a "CW/SSB" switch. Assuming the power supply can handle cw key down, other than higher efficiency, what other reason could t
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00001.html (6,504 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Feher" <n4fs@eozinc.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:24:59 -0500
In CW it can run Class C, but for SSB it has to be linear. 73 - Mike Mike B. Feher, N4FS 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 Folks I am putting a 8877 amp together. I was wondering why som
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00002.html (8,217 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 10:35:30 -0500
Most amps that have that switch are Class C on CW and some class AB (1 or 2) on SSB. That switch is used to change the bias on the tube to change amp class. 73 Don N8DE Folks I am putting a 8877 amp
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00003.html (8,118 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Garland" <4cx250b@miamioh.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:48:13 -0700
Charlie, With an 8877, two bias settings aren't necessary. You'd gain a bit more efficiency on CW and slightly ower heat dissipation in the room, but that's about all. It's pretty important with tetr
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00004.html (8,709 bytes)

5. [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:52:44 -0800
I am putting a 8877 amp together. I was wondering why some amps have a "CW/SSB" switch. Assuming the power supply can handle cw key down, other than higher efficiency, what other reason could there b
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00005.html (8,099 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 12:41:01 -0500
The FCC did it! Originally the rule was 1000W DC input for any mode. Then it changed to 2000W PEP for SSB only so the plate transformer was tapped and a switch added, Some of those older amps have a
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00008.html (9,504 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:41:52 -0600
I don't think this is true. Class C will generate terrible key clicks because it won't preserve the keying envelope. Kim N5OP "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as t
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00010.html (9,571 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Flood" <kk7uv@bresnan.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 06:36:07 -0700
I have an adjustable bias where I can run a little ZSAC for Class AB. But I can dial the bias until it *just* cuts off and I often use this setting for CW. What class am I running when I do so? I've
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00011.html (8,238 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Williamson via Amps <amps@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:55:52 -0500
Sounds like class B; plate current flows for 180 degrees of the excitation cycle. On the issue of key clicks and class C: Up until mid to late 50's when SSB came along, all of the ham amplifiers were
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00014.html (9,750 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: Paul Christensen <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:57:06 -0500
A class C amp will preserve the CW waveform in a linear region of operation, provided there's a means to sequence it out of class C during the T/R cycle and when the amp key line is active. Typically
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00015.html (11,687 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:09:03 -0500
Class B is defined as a conduction angle of 180 degrees exactly - therefor one can not be "fairly deep Class B". It might be deep into Class AB2 - i.e., well beyond the point at which the tube start
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00016.html (9,873 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:55:45 -0500
I don't think this is true. Class C will generate terrible key clicks because it won't preserve the keying envelope. That is not necessarily so, the keying waveform will be altered for sure, but I o
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00018.html (9,481 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: RCM <robrk@nidhog.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:26:42 -0500
Back then, you keyed the cutoff bias of the amp. My Central Electronics 20A had -100 vdc out the back that followed the keying and did a full cutoff of the HB 4X250's with operating bias set for clas
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00020.html (9,493 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: Vic Rosenthal <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 19:26:09 +0200
Close to cutoff is class B. If the amplifier has a combination of fixed bias plus some way of generating additional bias when driven (e.g. a grid resistor in a grid-driven amp) then it can move deepe
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00021.html (9,778 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:08:33 -0500
The best way to tell if your CW signal is objectionable is to look at it on a spectrum analyzer which is built in to many SDR rigs, find someone running one and ask him. "just" cutoff is a twilight z
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00023.html (11,039 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:12:59 -0500
Which is why saying Deep Class B signifies a variation and has been used for ages. Real old manuals used B/C Not accurate for a purist but fine for real world use. Carl KM1H Class B is defined as a c
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00024.html (10,950 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:27:26 -0500
-100V isnt even close to a full cutoff description since typical operating bias in Class C is -90V for 250B's. Carl KM1H -- Original Message -- From: "RCM" <robrk@nidhog.net> To: <amps@contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00026.html (11,115 bytes)

18. [Amps] Need for bias switch (CW/SSB) (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 08:17:55 -0800
Back then, you keyed the cutoff bias of the amp. My Central Electronics 20A had -100 vdc out the back that followed the keying and did a full cutoff of the HB 4X250's with operating bias set for clas
/archives//html/Amps/2016-01/msg00036.html (8,907 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu