Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+OPINIONS\s+PLEASE\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 23:51:04 EST
Hi All, I would like to have your opinions on something regarding amplifiers. Ameritron makes 3 powerful amplifiers that are all 3 exactly the same except for the tube compliment. They are the AL-82,
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00299.html (7,135 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 07:08:08 EST
_______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00303.html (8,212 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "Dudley Hurry" <jhurry@austin.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:03:09 -0600
Louie, Interesting problem....Decisions, Decisions..... I personally had not owned any of these amps, I have several friends that currently own the amps and they all have said that the amp perform as
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00304.html (10,293 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD GEORGE" <k6kwq@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:23:49 -0800
The real difference is no difference as that they would all sound the same as far as transmitted signal strength. I know I will get flack on this one, but if you can not gain an "S unit" is it worth
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00306.html (8,951 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Frenning, OZ1PIF" <oz1pif@get2net.dk>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:38:37 +0100
OK, I'll bite: I would take (I do not presently own one!) the AL-82 anytime - why? Because of it's instant-on capability, and low noise. There is nothing more frustating than having to wait three ver
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00307.html (9,477 bytes)

6. [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "k7fm" <k7fm@teleport.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:52:23 -0800
I noted that most responses have been personal preferences rather than performance. I have found the same issues. I have a number of commercial amplifiers. I love the Alphas. However, I have a Henry
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00310.html (8,768 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Tomm Aldridge <KD7QAE@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 01:54:37 +0000
Of course if your game is S units, this is correct. If it is uVolts, my vote, then go for the highest Pout. But, I agree with the antenna sentiment 100%. RICHARD GEORGE wrote: The real difference is
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00311.html (9,713 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:34:39 -0800
We have a couple AL-82's at the local club station, Louie. Recently I got to use one of them in contest service (ARRL 160 and CQ Worldwide CW Contests). So far, I am fairly impressed. The amplifier i
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00314.html (10,024 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: R.Measures <r@somis.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 04:09:45 -0800
** For what I do -- i.e., 40m and 60m daytime conversations with a dispersed group, the best antenna is a dipole at 30'. The best amplifier is whatever it takes to be heard over the jamming. In such
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00320.html (11,094 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Gudguyham@aol.com
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 07:18:34 EST
No flack from me...I respect your opinion, and it makes sense. That's why so many car companies are still in business. I recall the car commercial on TV where all the cars where cardboard boxes and l
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00322.html (7,695 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Ed Briggs <edbriggs@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 10:26:17 -0500
I own a new AL-1200. I chose this over the AL-1500 because I didn't see the value of spending an additional $500 dollars for the AL-1500. Both amps easily make the legal limit. I bought this rather t
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00325.html (10,678 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] OPINIONS PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: Dino Darling <k6rix@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 09:38:35 -0800
And people were still buying the cardboard boxes! I would seriously look at the AL-800 and AL-800H. A recent SK told me that this amp was the best bang for the buck due to the 3CX800A7 tube(s) and th
/archives//html/Amps/2003-12/msg00352.html (8,963 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu