- 1. [Amps] Pi L networks (score: 1)
- Author: "kk4tr" <jdube1@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:14:16 -0400
- Hello All I see the great interest over the past week about the Pi-L network. I was curious just exactly how this subject got started?? As interesting as it is it does seems pretty straight forward??
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00394.html (6,687 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Amps] Pi L networks (score: 1)
- Author: James Joyce <jjjoyce@optonline.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:23:51 -0400
- Hi Joe, I started it when I asked the question about the use of a 4to1 torroid step down transformer in place of a coil and switch assembly for the Pi-L. Many of the commercial ham amps use this meth
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00397.html (8,399 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Amps] Pi L networks (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:38:22 -0400
- pretty straight forward?? It does makes for better harmonic suppression without a doubt. >> That statement is so all-encompassing it is wrong. There isn't any rule carved in stone that says just chan
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00401.html (7,106 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Amps] Pi L networks (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:32:21 -0400
- Jim, These threads seem to take off into all kinds of tangents, but here is what I was saying before we got lost on talking about what we think happens in commercial amps. 1.) I've prototyped and me
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00404.html (10,561 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Amps] Pi L networks (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Flood" <flood@ixi.net>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:16:52 -0600
- Here is what I've derived for my 160 amp for a 2700-ohm plate load. Ctune 250pF Cload 1500 pF Lpi 39 uH Lel 9.1 uH Based on my previous questions regarding making room for everything and the answers
- /archives//html/Amps/2007-03/msg00409.html (7,576 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu