Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+every\s+db\s+lost\s+re\s+Tubes\s+vs\.\s+Solid\s+State\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <k4vud@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 06:01:30 +0000
I think we should also count pieces of incoming db lost by insertion of various devices. I know ever coax joint, every coax switch, and so on costs rcv db. But what does an amp in line take away? Tub
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00280.html (11,440 bytes)

2. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: W2XJ <w2xj@nyc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 23:04:49 -0700
A separate RCV antenna solves that issue which is really not germain to SS vs VT anyway. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00281.html (12,171 bytes)

3. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:47:04 -0700
You "know" WRONG! This is one of those often repeated myths with little basis in fact. A properly done coax connection is essentially lossless at HF. Loss in a switch depends on the quality of the sw
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00301.html (10,966 bytes)

4. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: BJ VOUTE <fxb1982@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:35:31 -0500
Amen! _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00302.html (11,531 bytes)

5. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:55:35 -0500
Exactly. It wouldn't take hardly any loss at all for a connector, switch, or whatever to get warm fairly quickly when power was transferred through it. If it did have significant loss, you would bur
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00303.html (7,474 bytes)

6. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Tom Horton <k5iid@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:25:25 -0700 (PDT)
Amen! Tom iid "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.." -- Winston Churchill "Democracy depends on w
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00310.html (11,646 bytes)

7. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Mike Waters <mikewate@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:10:23 -0500
Actually, the loss from a "UHF" connector would be in the coax, not all concentrated in the connector as I previously stated. I just got the following private e-mail that nicely explained that: "Whil
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00313.html (9,144 bytes)

8. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:13:14 -0700
Correction -- JUNK connectors can get hot with 1,5kW. Example are the JUNK elbows and Tees that use a tiny spring as the center conductor. I've also had the JUNK Tees fall apart. 73, Jim K9YC _______
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00314.html (7,907 bytes)

9. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:24:39 -0700
Yes. Several years ago, a VE1 (RGB, I think) sent me a copy of measurements he had done on a bunch of PL259s and barrels in a string. His data showed VERY low insertion loss to fairly high frequencie
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00315.html (8,704 bytes)

10. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Glen Zook <gzook@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 16:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
I had a distributor who decided to start tuning all of the two-way radios that he sold instead of having my company tune them for the desired frequency.  He set up a test bench and tried some of the
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00316.html (12,046 bytes)

11. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:57:02 -0600
Mike, Look at Wikipedia for "mismatch loss" to see how there can be loss without heat in an RF system. There are 2 kinds of loss: dissipative (heats up) and mismatch (produces no heat). If a connecto
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00317.html (10,429 bytes)

12. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:31:37 -0700
Mike got it right the first time. The length of a PL259 and mating connector is quite small as a fraction of a wavelength below 500 MHz. The so-called mis-match losses are pretty much fictional, and
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00318.html (8,235 bytes)

13. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Larry Benko <xxw0qe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:45:21 -0600
Nevertheless, mismatch losses are a BIG deal to the cellular folks. They do exist and can easily be seen at much lower frequencies with cheap connectors that are not correctly designed and also if te
/archives//html/Amps/2012-04/msg00319.html (9,030 bytes)

14. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 10:17:20 -0700
That's 1-2 GHz. I don't think anyone would debate that. I don't think anyone would debate that cheap connectors are problematic. I've had no end of problems with them. I suggest that you try measurin
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00013.html (7,965 bytes)

15. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 11:16:40 -0700
K9YC wrote... Some years ago, I discovered a 'cure' for the problems brought to my station by cheapie connectors. They ALL went into the S**can! Since then, no problems. No connector problems at leas
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00018.html (7,780 bytes)

16. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 11:22:18 -0700
I sold them for fifty cents each at hamfests. Jim _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00019.html (8,012 bytes)

17. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 13:53:41 -0500
That's great Brown. Fob your garbage junk off to unsuspecting and probably inexperienced hams. Stuff you wouldn't use yourself. What a guy. 37 Rob K5UJ _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00020.html (8,077 bytes)

18. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 15:59:25 -0400
Selling weak tubes and lossy coax to CBers is also a lot of fun but nothing beats selling leaky paper caps to audiophools. Carl KM1H That's great Brown. Fob your garbage junk off to unsuspecting and
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00024.html (9,805 bytes)

19. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 13:06:34 -0700
Yeah, they're almost as gullible as hams, who spend upwards of $200 on Heil mics with $1 capsules in them, magic 43 ft verticals, Windom antennas, G5RV "all band" antennas, so-called baluns in enclos
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00025.html (8,902 bytes)

20. Re: [Amps] every db lost re Tubes vs. Solid State (score: 1)
Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 20:13:30 +0000
Much the same here. And it's a real problem, because every connector I can buy locally (Chile) is Chinese-made, and while the best of them are satisfactory, most of the rest are junk. But not always
/archives//html/Amps/2012-05/msg00026.html (10,343 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu