Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+higher\s+v\.\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+higher\s+v\.\?\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: c s <carlseye@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:38:34 -0400; over to the new compact electronic fluorescent globes.So far,so good.I have an idea that the higher voltage creates higher electricity bills. 73....Bob..VK3ZL.. Of course it does!!! Do you think the; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00407.html (6,582 bytes)
2. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:19:27 -0400; I switched to the compacts in a few places about 5 years ago when imports became available at decent prices. I use them in places where I havent been able to train my wife or remaining at home son to; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00408.html (8,138 bytes)
3. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:28:35 +0100; To put the energy saving in context - you use a 20W low energy bulb instead of 100W incandescent for 12 hours and save about 1kWh. The equivalent is about 1/9th of a litre of gasoline (1/30th US gall; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00411.html (7,235 bytes)
4. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:51:32 -0400; When I get my foot into my 68 Impala SS-396 the savings is gone for the next 10 years. I just got tired of burnt out bulbs. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00413.html (8,325 bytes)
5. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:47:55 -0500; You pay a fair amount more up-front for the CFL bulbs and I have seen nowhere near the lifetime they are claiming. They blow around here all of the time and I would be surprised if I was getting a ye; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00414.html (8,470 bytes)
6. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Bonner" <rbonner@qro.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:35:08 -0500; Very interesting Carl. I would call the current stash of CFL third generation. I started back in the middle 80's trying out 1 lamp in my house. IT BURNED OUT QUICKLY. I returned it and they gave me a; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00419.html (11,009 bytes)
7. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: W0UN -- John Brosnahan <shr@swtexas.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:44:56 -0500; As a follow up. Just had two more CFLs die tonight -- AFTER I wrote the above note. A fixture of three of them had been on much of the day while I worked under them. Turned them off for a half hour; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00420.html (8,655 bytes)
8. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: "Roger" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:15:15 -0400; Our line voltage is showing 117-118 on the UPS which is typical through the house. The shop which is on its own transformer runs 119-120. Even with 5 computers running my bill is pretty close to wha; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00422.html (10,649 bytes)
9. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: "David G4FTC" <g4ftc@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:26:19 +0000; I've also experienced short life-times with some CFLs I installed about 5 years ago. Probably no more than a few hundred hours of operation, far less than an incandescent bulb and certainly far less; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00423.html (8,599 bytes)
10. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:58:25 +0100; Do they fade in the same way that 'regular' fluorescent tubes do? I had to dismantle a fixture to replace a dead tube at work, so I thought I'd do all four while I was there. I was staggered by the e; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00426.html (9,354 bytes)
11. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:19:57 -0400; I'm sure that there are several versions made in several plants. Some good, some bad. The ones I have take about 30 seconds to get full brilliance and are somewhat close to the color of incadescents; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00427.html (10,865 bytes)
12. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: "Roger" <sub1@rogerhalstead.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:17:19 -0400; I've not noticed it with the ones in the house, but out in the garage they have changed to a warmer color, or the new one is much whiter, I'm not sure which. When one goes out in the house maybe I'l; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00428.html (9,535 bytes)
13. Re: [Amps] higher v.?? (score: 1): Author: "David C. Hallam" <dhallam@rapidsys.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:03:33 -0400; There must have been some improvements in CFL's recently. We have a light fixture in the den that has 4 bulbs. Our line voltage runs about 126V and I was replacing incandescent bulbs at the rate of 1; /archives//html/Amps/2007-07/msg00429.html (12,762 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]