Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+new\s+amp\s+race\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Amps\]\s+new\s+amp\s+race\s*$/: 61 ]

Total 61 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 21:14:18 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: It's an old adage but true: Most man made noise is vertically polarized because of the "shorting" effect of the earth. As a result if one is having troub; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00220.html (9,243 bytes)
22. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 21:23:10 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I think you misunderstand. I and others did not say not to buy one, but rather to put your money into antennas first, THEN invest in an amp. Everyone's s; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00221.html (8,816 bytes)
23. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Glen Zook via Amps <amps@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 21:28:22 +0000 (UTC); I do have amplifiers although my highest powered one won't quite make 1500-watts (it will do about 1400-watts) and have had since the mid 1970s. I also agree that having the best antenna possible fo; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00222.html (12,717 bytes)
24. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.qozzy.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:47:01 -0400; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) My 1969 Chevy El Camino SS with a 396 big block would make 375. REPLY: On a recent road trip, my 2017 Chevy Cruze with a 1.4 liter 4-cylinder turbo got 51.6 mi; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00223.html (10,499 bytes)
25. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: donroden <donroden@hiwaay.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:49:52 -0500; Bought a WSPRLite transmitter... amazing to see vk and zl reporting way above noise using 50 mw....Yes 1/5 of a watt. Don W4DNR Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -- Original message --From: Gl; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00224.html (12,948 bytes)
26. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Alek Petkovic <vk6apk@bigpond.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 05:55:32 +0800; Agreed. When K0IR and co went to VP8 (South Orkney) they did it ultra lite style, without amps. From VK6 to there, is among the most difficult paths in the world. That one is one of the last two I ne; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00225.html (11,579 bytes)
27. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: "Mark Bitterlich" <markbitterlich@embarqmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 18:24:27 -0400; I'd blame this more on sunspot lows than egos. Egos have always been with us, but we are seeing unprecedented poor solar conditions. Bill Turner" <dezrat@outlook.com replied by saying: The answer to; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00226.html (12,578 bytes)
28. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Ron Youvan <ka4inm@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 19:20:13 -0400; It's an old adage but true: Most man made noise is vertically polarized because of the "shorting" effect of the earth. As a result if one is having trouble with man made noise, going to a horizontal; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00228.html (9,842 bytes)
29. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 23:34:45 +0000 (UTC); Bill, My QTH is riddled with antennas, so I'm hardly going to object to advice to build a few more. :-) There are pieces of a 2-meter Quagi and a tribander VHF/UHF quad out on the workbench right now; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00229.html (9,706 bytes)
30. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Catherine James <catherine.james@att.net>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 23:41:23 +0000 (UTC); The 10 dB assumed that it was replacing an antenna that wasn't high enough to perform well, so some of that gain comes from the tri-bander pattern, and some from the 70 ft height. But that requires; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00230.html (8,841 bytes)
31. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 17:02:27 -0700; You must put a lot of stock in the ARRL reviews :-) I heard that if you buy some advertising in QST for the amp, you are sure to get a raving review. 73 Tom W7WHY ____________________________________; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00231.html (9,954 bytes)
32. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 00:55:34 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Nobody is "hounding" anybody to do anything. You're taking this much too seriously. Lots of good advice is offered here and everyone is free to take it,; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00232.html (8,332 bytes)
33. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 01:00:38 +0000; -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Antennas can be too high, believe it or not. Talking about DX, not groundwave. Some of the gain is from ground reflection and if the antenna is too high; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00233.html (8,508 bytes)
34. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 01:04:24 +0000; I do. Numbers don't lie. Did you hear that on the Internet? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00234.html (9,501 bytes)
35. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 18:55:12 -0700; I've studied that extensively, and even wrote a tutorial applications note on what I learned. It's pretty near impossible for most of us to rig an antenna too high for bands below 30M -- a quarter-wa; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00237.html (9,172 bytes)
36. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 02:02:59 +0000; Ron, and all, I learned: Natural noise (lightning) is vertically polarized because lightning is a vertical event. I have seen lots of horizontal lightning, from cloud to cloud, or inside the same clo; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00238.html (11,835 bytes)
37. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Manfred Mornhinweg <manfred@ludens.cl>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 02:09:51 +0000; Jim, a piece of advice to solve that tree climber problem: Get a drone! A good stabilized drone will get a fishing line exactly over the branch where you want it, and its FPV camera system allows you; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00239.html (8,243 bytes)
38. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP <k2vco.vic@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 06:15:26 +0300; I think that on the lower bands, much local manmade noise is propagated by the "ground wave" mode. 73, Victor, 4X6GP Rehovot, Israel Formerly K2VCO http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ I learned: Natural noise; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00240.html (12,487 bytes)
39. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 20:22:31 -0700; Thanks for the advice. However -- I suspect you've never seen a redwood forest. They're dense -- if you have one, you have a dozen, and their branches are also pretty dense. Bottom line -- climbers a; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00241.html (8,528 bytes)
40. Re: [Amps] new amp race (score: 1): Author: donroden@hiwaay.net; Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 18:50:08 -0500; Bought a WSPRLite transmitter... amazing to see vk and zl reporting way above noise using 50 mw....Yes 1/5 of a watt. For you math majors that let this slip by, 50mw is 1/20th of a watt... On the way; /archives//html/Amps/2017-05/msg00252.html (9,198 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]