- 81. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (score: 1)
- Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:05:27 -0400
- . And all those times you have been seriously confused. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00590.html (9,937 bytes)
- 82. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:49:54 -0400
- I see that you don't want to address the other questions asked of you several times. I and others have provided you with several examples of RF NOT flowing thru a plate but you ignore those and hang
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00598.html (9,962 bytes)
- 83. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (score: 1)
- Author: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:25:28 -0400
- There is a large hole in the chassis where the tube passes thru. 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00600.html (13,963 bytes)
- 84. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:19:30 +0000
- This discussion is getting lost; we need to get back to that original question about the padder cap. Bill: please can you post photographs of "above" and "below" the chassis, so that other people can
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00602.html (9,838 bytes)
- 85. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (score: 1)
- Author: "la7sl Nils Petter" <la7sl@norgespost.no>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:08:07 +0100
- Hi ! I have not followed this discussion closely... But I have always believed that electrical currents can and will be following any conductor...regardless of frequency... And YES..I do know about s
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00603.html (12,026 bytes)
- 86. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (score: 1)
- Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:47:37 -0400
- And plenty of other ingress/egress points in any real world amp as mentioned over and over. Even a thru bolt can transfer RF. Carl KM1H There is a large hole in the chassis where the tube passes thru
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00608.html (14,590 bytes)
- 87. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (score: 1)
- Author: "Carl" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:02:39 -0400
- Gary, I believe he is following the JI and Measures school of discussion. Ignore what doesnt make you look good and treat the rest as a circular argument until everyone gives up. Reminds me of Toyot
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00610.html (10,535 bytes)
- 88. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:32:02 -0700
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Sorry, I don't have any pix, but I can describe it. The load cap is a vacuum variable, mounted by a metal bracket which connects one side of the cap to the chassis. The padde
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00622.html (10,727 bytes)
- 89. Re: [Amps] placement of RF choke bypass cap. (score: 1)
- Author: "pc5m, Carel" <pc5m@xs4all.nl>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:06:13 +0100
- Hi, as one of the "experimenters" with solid metal disks and taken the conclusion (based on the latest experiment) that RF current must go through the material I have reasonable doubt that my conclus
- /archives//html/Amps/2010-03/msg00624.html (10,437 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu