Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+\[Amps\]\s+Convert\s+Heathkit\s+SB\-220\s+to\s+50Mhz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+\[Amps\]\s+Convert\s+Heathkit\s+SB\-220\s+to\s+50Mhz\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [BULK] - [Amps] Convert Heathkit SB-220 to 50Mhz (score: 1): Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:43:47 -0700; Manuel, is nobody answering you on this? I don't know what conversions you've seen, but I've converted three SB-220s to six meters over the years, and each the same way. In all cases, I got rid of th; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00200.html (9,509 bytes)
2. RE: [BULK] - [Amps] Convert Heathkit SB-220 to 50Mhz (score: 1): Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:11:37 -0700; Manuel, I'd suggest you go ahead and try that, but in my experience, that's a lousy modification. It assumes you're sacrificing only the 10m band for 6m, and leaving the other bands intact, including; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00203.html (11,870 bytes)
3. RE: [BULK] - [Amps] Convert Heathkit SB-220 to 50Mhz (score: 1): Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:39:50 -0400; Back in 1992 I converted an SB-220 to 50 MHz following much the same path as WB2WIK. However, I was able to achieve much the same result with less-intrusive mods. 100W of drive from an IC-756 yielded; /archives//html/Amps/2004-08/msg00219.html (9,384 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]