Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BULK\]\s+\-\s+RE\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+Re\:\s+Cutting\s+braid\s+\-\s+Installing\s+PL259\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [BULK] - RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Cutting braid - Installing PL259 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:54:47 -0800
Same here Bud. My guess is most hams have been frustrated by this task. Here is how I solved the problem once and for all: 1. Obtain a professional temperature controlled soldering iron with moderate
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00694.html (11,977 bytes)

2. RE: [BULK] - RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Cutting braid - Installing PL259 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:24:35 -0800
Well that's interesting. You referenced several times in your posts "...what Amphenol recommends..." etc. - for example not pre-tinning the braid and now the 0.00" braid edge dimension. I was surpris
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00715.html (11,571 bytes)

3. Re: [BULK] - RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Cutting braid - Installing PL259 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:01:28 -0800
if on or (http://www.doceng.com). Amphenol, Kind of an odd specification number, but, since that connector probably antedates World War II and all the modern style of specification (I'd expect a MIL
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00722.html (9,870 bytes)

4. RE: [BULK] - RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Cutting braid - Installing PL259 (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:08:10 -0800
Kind of an odd specification number, but, since that connector probably antedates World War II and all the modern style of specification (I'd expect a MIL-C-xxx type spec for a connector), it could w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00723.html (10,118 bytes)

5. Re: [BULK] - RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Cutting braid - Installing PL259 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:43:20 -0800
expect So they never did a UGxxx part number for it? (since all the other connectors, including waveguide flanges, are UG) I suppose that a standard assembly procedure would probably be in a handbook
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00728.html (12,326 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu