Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[RTTY\]\s+I\s+just\s+have\s+to\s+ask\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:46:51 -0600
FCC rules do not give "exclusive right" to a beacon QRG, but they do give "automatic control" privileges on some band segments. (See §97.203 excerpt below) 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 §97.203 Beacon statio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00112.html (9,665 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:45:31 -0500
Propagation beacons are one of the more useful tools in a DX'er's and contester's arsenal, as they can give you a passive indication of propagation on a particular band to a particular part of the wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00114.html (11,869 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 18:31:06 -0500
I don't begrudge the beacons their frequencies - they provide a real service to Amateur Radio. I do, however find that my blood pressure goes up a point or two when those ________s on 14230 claim tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00115.html (9,412 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:40:27 -0500
I appreciate the NCDXF beacons. But those HP beacons on 18 and 30 meters, particularly on 30M, surely do QRM a lot of QSOs. The 30M beacon from HP1AVS is in a very popular part of the band for QSOs o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00116.html (8,305 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 22:32:36 -0400
With all due respect... the beacon network, as I recall, didn't get "shoved" into the digital sub-band; if anything, it was the other way around. Why are we even discussing the potential for moving t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00121.html (12,780 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:20:37 -0400
Think of it this way Hank - those folks who think they *have* to stay on 14230 aren't moving to other frequencies and depriving you of places to operate other than 14230. You're winning that one! Gen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00123.html (9,756 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: Prasad <vu2ptt@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:15:25 +0530
And not to forget the cool applications like Faros which automatically listen to all the NCDXF beacon frequencies and generate a chart for showing best propagation times from each beacon area per ban
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00126.html (14,252 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu