Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[SUSPECTED\s+SPAM\]\s+Re\:\s+Is\s+it\s+time\s+to\s+reevaluate\s+CQWWScoring\s+Rules\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[SUSPECTED\s+SPAM\]\s+Re\:\s+Is\s+it\s+time\s+to\s+reevaluate\s+CQWWScoring\s+Rules\?\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Is it time to reevaluate CQWWScoring Rules? (score: 1): Author: "John" <shore1@xplornet.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 07:59:33 -0800; To see a post like that makes me ill to think someone could say such a thing and that alone would turn me off helping others as a casual operator to obtain points from someone like me and to further; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00365.html (13,184 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]