Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+1\s+x\s+2\s+callsigns\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+1\s+x\s+2\s+callsigns\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger (NE0P)" <ne0p@lcisp.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:36:01 -0500; What is the best 1 x 2 prefix to have for contesting-K, N or W? It seems like many of the contesting stations have K 1 x 2 calls, but is that actually seen as the best contesting prefix? 73s John NE0; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00205.html (7,167 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: mwdink@eskimo.com; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:30:55 -0700 (PDT); Well, Dan W7WA always beats me in the pileups (but I don't think that's due to his callsign) dink, N7WA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00208.html (7,154 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:33:51 -0600; It is not as much the call as the station. K's I think are more prevalent because of the timing of one of the "vanity/chose your call" periods. Kilowatt, Norway/November, Whiskey/Washington. NA7XX ha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00211.html (7,916 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Faber" <andrew.faber@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:57:53 -0700; John, If subtle distinctions among calls really mattered, how could W3LPL do so well? 73, Andy, AE6Y -- Original Message -- From: "W0MU Mike Fatchett" <w0mu@w0mu.com> To: <ne0p@lcisp.com>; <cq-contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00212.html (9,217 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:05:07 -0400; Or KC1XX which is a lenthgy CW call in comparison to most 2x1s and 1x2s prevalent SS (NE0P) seems _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com htt; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00213.html (11,150 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:35:16 -0400; John Geiger (NE0P) asked: "What is the best 1 x 2 prefix to have for contesting" Regardless of the prefix, try not get one with the suffix of a "big gun" contester! I get many WRKD B4, when I know th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00214.html (7,675 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Ken Claerbout" <K4ZW@adelphia.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:23:26 -0400; Because most of the ops have 1x2 K calls! 73 Ken K4ZW (ARRL CW 40 meter op - W3LPL) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.con; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00216.html (7,139 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: "ChetMoore" <ChetMoore@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:51:16 -0400; Here's the secret............ It's not the arrow, it's the indian !!! 73 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00217.html (8,055 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:31:38 -0400; Short callsigns, especially on CW, probably help the rate. But, a callsign like W3LPL has the huge advantage of being known by everyone from years of top-notch operations. Operating 80 meters there,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00219.html (8,372 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:20:40 -0500; The key to callsigns, IMHO, is to pick one with good phonetics and good CW duration, and then, most important -- USE IT A LOT! If you use it a lot, that will become more important than the actual cal; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00221.html (10,339 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:56:43 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** I have to disagree. W3LPL has a simple rhythm that makes it easier to remember. Compare to, for example, W3ZXQ (inactive, thank goodness) :-) Bill, W6WRT _____; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-04/msg00222.html (8,169 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]