CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 x 2 callsigns
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 18:56:43 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

At 01:20 PM 4/22/2006, Kelly Taylor wrote:

>As callsigns go, there's nothing extraordinary about it.

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

I have to disagree. W3LPL has a simple rhythm that makes it easier to 
remember. Compare to, for example, W3ZXQ (inactive, thank goodness) :-)

Bill, W6WRT

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>