Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+A\s+Contester\'s\s+Dilemma\,or\s+when\s+is\s+it\s+necessary\s+to\s+take\s+the\s+fall\s+for\s+someone\s+else\?\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:31:34 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Since moving to SC I have noticed that it is generally considered a pretty rare multiplier where states or sections are used as mults, e.g. SS, ARRL DX, etc. That then raises the dilemma of when to s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00421.html (9,457 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:34:34 -0700
If you work someone, and they have been given the impression that the QSO was completed successfully (i.e. by completing it with "TU N2IC SS"), then you are obligated to leave the QSO in your log. If
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00422.html (9,997 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:48:44 -0500
Yep - as one of those QRPers this year in SS CW that not only happened to me a couple of times, but I would expect it. And I think most QRP stations would understand. If the other station can't get m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00425.html (12,233 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:49:29 -0800
Don't mislead the other station into thinking they have a valid QSO if they do not. If you ask for repeats, you can't get it and say "sorry" and move on, the other station should not log the QSO eith
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00426.html (9,741 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:04:05 -0800 (PST)
Hi Dennis It is both stations' responsibility to assume that the QSO is complete. If you didn't copy all of the information for the other station, then by the definition of the contest rules it isn't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00431.html (12,374 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: Denis K7GK <k7gk@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:16:54 -0800
... A related question is what is considered sufficient for completing the QSO, especially on CW? For example (say in CQWW CW): XX1XX: CQ TEST XX1XX XX1XX K7GK: K7GK XX1XX: K7GK 5NN 14 K7GK: R 5NN 3
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00434.html (10,228 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <jds@twistedoak.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:39:22 -0800
The other other answer (besides "don't TU if you don't got it") is don't acknowledge the call in the first place if it is too weak to complete the contact. Obviously this is a judgment call and with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00435.html (9,290 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: mike dormaol dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:08:41 -0800
if you work an old man using a hand key with a chirpy signal who has to stop and write down all contact information, and he is from washington state, go right ahead and speed away, but if he is in ne
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00437.html (8,788 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <n5ten@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:10:22 -0800 (PST)
I would think that if the running station (the one calling CQ) didn't get the exchange from you correctly, he would keep asking for the missing piece before doing another CQ or QRZ. That is usually w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00440.html (11,759 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:32:39 -0700
Seems to me that this discussion, is very tightly linked to the Qso B4 chat. hmmm? And the other side of it, is simple, when the other station, qrp or not, attempts another Q, it may be a wiser decis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00443.html (10,060 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:51:50 -0800
So true. If someone busts my call, and I sent it a couple of times to correct them, and they just say TU QRZ, it gets deleted from my log unless I hear my call sent right. Most software does that aut
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00451.html (9,367 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:39:57 -0600
Why would you do that? You would reduce your score when you did not make an error. If you know the other guy worked you (there is no possibility he worked someone else that you may not have heard) an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00452.html (10,942 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:30:00 -0600
Correct. If, at the time of the QSO in question, his log has everything I sent in it except he busted my callsign, I get credit for the contact and he doesn't. Mark, N5OT ___________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00458.html (9,844 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:07:41 -0800
Hi Bob Well, I guess it just because that is just the way I do it. If he didn't work ME, he don't go in my log. Then if he did get my call right, and didn't acknowledge it, I guess he loses the conta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00471.html (9,854 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:30:42 -0800
Hi Bob Probably not having that call in my log won't make as much difference as him not having my call in his log if he is a 'big gun'. I contest just for the fun, not to actually win anything. If a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00475.html (11,321 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu