Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+Contest\s+Multioperator\s+Station\s+Guidelines\s*$/: 49 ]

Total 49 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:46:40 -0400
Guidelines Issued for ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Stations 10/22/2020 ARRL has issued guidelines for multioperator stations competing in the ARRL DX Contest (CW and phone). With the global pandemic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00109.html (8,661 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Randy Thompson <k5zd@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 02:43:56 +0000
April fools day came early? Would love to hear some of the reasoning behind this rather radical new (?) category. Randy K5ZD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00110.html (10,082 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri VE3XB" <ve3xb@rogers.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:57:19 -0400
Solves interference problem for two or more transmitters on the same band... 73 Yuri VE3XB Guidelines Issued for ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Stations 10/22/2020 ARRL has issued guidelines for multi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00112.html (8,390 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:29:37 -0400
I agree Randy. How in the world would you enforce this rule? If you want to social distance just don't allow any multi-op's this year.JeffSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -- Original m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00114.html (11,450 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: James Cain <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:17:30 +0000
No, Randy, it's for real! But the winner has already been announced, and the winner is K1DG. cain K1TN -- April fools day came early? Would love to hear some of the reasoning behind this rather radic
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00115.html (7,643 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:59:16 +0000 (UTC)
No requirement that the individual stations must be in the same state or province? Does one send the master station's state, or the state where they are actually located?  If the later, it might prov
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00116.html (11,587 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: OZ1BII Henning <mail@oz1bii.dk>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:30:47 +0200
I see no problem defining which state or province - it is the state/province where the "Master station" belongs. All the participants use the same call sign and the same report. -- * Vy 73 de OZ2I He
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00117.html (13,413 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:07:01 -0500
Lets not eliminate multiop categories because of a virus. What is next, eliminate expeditions since flying increases the chance of exposure? Every situation is different. John KK9A Jeff Sent from my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00118.html (8,711 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Yuri <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:50:30 -0400
Oh yeah! It's totally in the spirit of today. If someone can't ride at 40 MPH, let's ban this speed for everybody! Yuri  VE3DZ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00120.html (8,491 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:29:10 +0000 (UTC)
This reminds me of the CQ-WW Unlimited category (not sure if that was the name) which was in effect for a few years.  It allowed pretty much anything within the applicable contest rules and national
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00121.html (13,424 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:44:54 -0500
Yew... I thought they meant the ops would REMOTE each position from their homes. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00122.html (9,704 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:04:54 -0600
There may not be a "master station". Just a bunch of home stations at different QTH's who work together like an IARU HQ-like station. For WAS/LoTW purposes, you think it's okay if everyone sends (rel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00123.html (15,032 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:45:05 -0400
John, That's not really a very good analogy. A rule like this isn't really enforceable. How do you prove someone is conducing their multi-op in this way?  We all know COVID is a much debated issue. T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00126.html (10,941 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:57:33 -0400
If someone wants to do a multi-op and remote to a specific station location it's pretty easy to setup. I operated WX6V's station remotely (from GA) in CA in the CQP this year. I got his station setup
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00127.html (17,798 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Lunn" <bels@erols.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 18:33:48 +0000
I see a huge problem in sending anything other than the actual state/province in which the transmitter is located. It is patently dishonest. Maybe that doesn't bother anyone else, and for contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00128.html (15,101 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Michael Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:47:01 -0700 (PDT)
The request for this "COVID-19 one-year variance" for the ARRL sponsored contests originated from a group of EU contesters and through the Radiosport department at ARRL HQ. It then went on to the Boa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00129.html (12,380 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: OZ1BII Henning <mail@oz1bii.dk>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:25:55 +0200
Wise words from Mike W7VQ - nothing to add. -- * Vy 73 de OZ2I Henning * -- _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00131.html (14,230 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:58:04 -0400
This is not a problem. It is extremely easy to upload correctly for WAS, county, and grid square purposes on LoTW. I did it for W8I when we had stations in MD, VA, and WV. Each LoTW QSL shows the cor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00133.html (10,820 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:16:33 -0600
So, everyone who works W3DQ, gets multiplier credit for DC, even though most of the stations using the W3DQ callsign/exchange were not in DC ? Reminds me of Don Miller and supposed North Korea DXCC s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00134.html (12,000 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:41:41 -0600
Here's the translation for how this went down.... Some European contesters, who probably aren't ARRL members, really like the idea of having IARU-contest HQ-like stations in other contests. They use
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00135.html (12,878 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu