CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines

To: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>, cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines
From: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Reply-to: n2ic@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:16:33 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
So, everyone who works W3DQ, gets multiplier credit for DC, even though most of the stations using the W3DQ callsign/exchange were not in DC ?

Reminds me of Don Miller and supposed North Korea DXCC shenanigans.

73,
Steve, N2IC

On 10/23/2020 02:58 PM, David Siddall wrote:
This is not a problem.  It is extremely easy to upload correctly for WAS, county, and grid square purposes on  LoTW.  I did it for W8I when we had stations in MD, VA, and WV.  Each LoTW QSL shows the correct state, county, and grid square for the station making the QSO.

And since you use D.C. as an example, I'll note that Eric W3DQ in DC reports that he did the same for LoTW confirmations for W3A, N3A & W3C special event stations.

73, Dave K3ZJ

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:09 PM Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com <mailto:n2icarrl@gmail.com>> wrote:
  <    >

    For WAS/LoTW purposes, you think it's okay if everyone sends (relatively
    rare) DC, when all but one of the
    transmitting stations is located in VA or MD ? The DC station might not even
    make any QSO's - just there for contest purposes.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>