Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+Rule\s+Change\s+for\s+Remote\s+Ops\s+\-\s+Always\s+Multi\-op\?\s+I\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:44:13 +0000
I don't think the station owner swapping out an amp for a guest op should change the category. Nothing was done to find or identify a qso for the guest op. And, how many station owners are going to l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00161.html (15,063 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:51:24 -0400
How far do you go? Is it okay for the station owner to do things like adjust the antenna switching while the operator continues to make QSOs? How about turning the antenna(s) or dealing with computer
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00162.html (16,698 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I (score: 1)
Author: Radio KØHB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 17:35:28 +0000
Good point. I once swapped out the power transformer in an NCL-2000 during my Sweepstakes off time. 73, de Hans, KØHB "Just a boy and his radio" How far do you go? Is it okay for the station owner to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00165.html (11,325 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I (score: 1)
Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:39:54 -0600
The problem is there's no way to enforce any of this, short of having streaming video of the entire station. Barry W2UP In a true single op, this wouldn't happen. You would stop and fix the problem y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00166.html (18,021 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:18:24 -0700
Postulate three single ops, each want to do very well in a contest, perhaps even win. Each has a piece of equipment they fear will fail during the contest, so they take measures. The first has a ham
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00168.html (12,656 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:10:47 -0600
What's new with this? We have had many rules for years and years that have no way of being enforced other than reliance on the integrity of the entrant. W0MU Barry W2UP In a true single op, this woul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00170.html (19,335 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu