CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I

To: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>, Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I
From: Radio KØHB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 17:35:28 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Good point.  I once swapped out the power transformer in an NCL-2000 during my 
Sweepstakes “off time”.

73, de Hans, KØHB
"Just a boy and his radio"™

From: Ria Jairam
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 5:29 PM
To: Chuck Dietz
Cc: Charles Harpole; Kelly Taylor; Jahnke, Bart, W9JJ; CQ-Contest Reflector; 
Barry
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rule Change for Remote Ops - Always Multi-op? I

How far do you go?  Is it okay for the station owner to do things like
adjust the antenna switching while the operator continues to make
QSOs? How about turning the antenna(s) or dealing with computer
glitches?

In a true single op, this wouldn't happen. You would stop and fix the
problem yourself. IMO, having a "pit crew" to do this presents an
unfair advantage.

Ria, N2RJ

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>