Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+single\s+op\s+definition\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition (score: 1)
Author: kr2q@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:35:28 +0000 (GMT)
Simple...go to the source: the RULES 2.1.Single Operator: One person performs all transmitting, receiving, and logging functions as well as equipment and antenna adjustments. So...did KV4FZ (or any c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00287.html (6,865 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:07:31 -0600
And if Yuri had operated within the confines or privileges of HIS license we would not be having this discussion. KV4FZ was a control OPERATOR. Without this Control OPERATOR Yuri would have been oper
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00297.html (8,200 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:02:09 -0400
Supposedly, Herb did not actually operate. By definition, I can have an OPERATOR sit in my room and not be an actual OPERATOR . The only function of a control operator is to prevent or assume respon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00305.html (8,087 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition (score: 1)
Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:19:30 -0500
Now you need the ARRL definition of control operator to actually be able to make a decision. My thinking about control operator is they are responsible for all transmissions and radio adjustments, bu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00307.html (8,289 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m73@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:03:21 -0400
Mike, you've gotten right to the heart of the matter by emphasizing the word OPERATOR. To me, this highlights the fact that KV4FZ was an operator *in name only*. As far as we know. he didn't do any o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00311.html (11,505 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:55:46 -0600
Herb did do something. His presence allowed another operator do operate where he did. Without Herb there Yuri operated Illegally and thus is an automatic DQ as he violated a different rule. I have no
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00314.html (12,493 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:38:09 -0700
And not that it is necessarily pertinent to Yuri's situation, but when I was the KV4FZ operator in the 1983 CQ WW CW DX Contest, it was primarily Mrs. Schoenbohm who I would say was the station's "co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00318.html (10,478 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL single op definition (score: 1)
Author: <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:10:50 -0400
So...If I just show up at your house and you are present and I start operating...how does that play? And you are sitting in the radio room while I'm operating...thereby 'enabling me' to operate YOUR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00320.html (14,356 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu