- 1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX points system (score: 1)
- Author: KR2Q@worldnet.att.net (Douglas Zwiebel)
- Date: Tue Mar 25 17:38:22 1997
- I have carefully thought about it, and I've decided to agree that the point system sucks. But rather than make the points for same country QSO's count more, I think they should count less! That way,
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00356.html (7,248 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX points system (score: 1)
- Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike)
- Date: Tue Mar 25 11:34:03 1997
- This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- =_NextPart_000_01BC3910.8EF1C300 Content-Type: text/plain; c
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00358.html (9,280 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX points system (score: 1)
- Author: w2up@Op.Net (Barry Kutner)
- Date: Tue Mar 25 21:59:57 1997
- But rather than make the points Doug - I think your calendar is off - it's not April 1 yet - or were you serious? A question for the OTs - wasn't there some kind of quota system in ARRL DX years ago,
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00361.html (7,597 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX points system (score: 1)
- Author: lu6beg@canopus.com.ar (Ernesto M. Grueneberg)
- Date: Tue Mar 25 16:51:48 1997
- "contest supposed to promote activity" ???? I thought the contest was a competition. The 1 point idea is good, but is only needed in USA, because this could mean less DX QSOs for you. Sometimes will
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00367.html (7,731 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX points system (score: 1)
- Author: VK1FF@contesting.com (VK1FF)
- Date: Sat Mar 22 02:15:39 1997
- Is WPX an international or domestic contest? I agree with SM2EKM, changing intra-country contacts to 1 point will make the contest a domestic competition for the US. The change certainly won't benifi
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00375.html (8,113 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu