Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Committee\s+blog\s+post\s+\-\s+audio\s+recording\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Mark <markzl3ab@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:10:04 +1200
The CQ WW Committee blog post about audio recording is a bit of surprise to me. Up until now I had figured audio recording would only be an issue in Oceania for the serious entrants (i.e. entries wit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00276.html (9,531 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:44:45 -0300
Hi Mark seems no more casual entries! On CQWW SSB, SO10HP, some of the top where DQ or sent to checklog so the official winning was YV6CR with 1013 QSOS and less than 15 hours of operation, when a to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00290.html (12,060 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Shelby Summerville <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:57:58 -0400
I have only "seriously" entered a few contests. When it becomes necessary for me to record my operation, especially if it's a "casual" operation, consider me a non participant. It seems to me that in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00291.html (11,772 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:00:38 -0500
I am not a serious contester but enter many of the larger contests, and I don't have the ability to audio record my activity. Guess I will be DQed if I accidently win a catetory. 73 John AF5CC ______
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00292.html (11,061 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:10:43 -0400
Great comments... How about this scenario..... I start working the contest without a recording knowing that I would not be able to give it a 'competitive' effort due to the fact that my wife and I ar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00293.html (12,180 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:18:37 -0500
When is the groom and maid of honor getting married? Hopefully not during a CQ contest weekend. 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00296.html (13,898 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:33:31 -0400
How about this scenario: I go to the Caribbean for a fun trip and to play some contesting.. I do low power, because I don't want to put a huge effort into the station. Thinking I'm not going to win,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00298.html (12,148 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:44:00 -0400
Sometimes a casual effort is all that is needed for a winning score do to lack of competition in a particular category. It is probably a good idea to always record however I doubt that the WW committ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00299.html (11,200 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:47:18 +0000
With all this talk about recording I thought I might as well do it (built into my logger). Maybe Ill learn something useful after the results come out. Recorded the RTTY Sprint. Got the LCR, it had t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00305.html (13,841 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:02:14 -0700
All of these scenarios defy logic. The CQ committee has the RIGHT to request a recording. That doesn't mean that they WILL unless they suspect that something is rotten in Denmark (not a slam on Denma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00306.html (11,265 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 04:42:14 +0000 (UTC)
Come on guys I think this is getting a bit unreal. I'm a 'serious' competitor and will probably never record my ops. If the committee wants to see a recording it's because something appears to be irr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00307.html (13,281 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:49:23 -0500
Congratulations are in order for KK9A! This is the correct perspective to have. If you do not cheat, it does not matter what your score is, you will not be asked for anything. Not for an explanation,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00313.html (13,836 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:48:10 -0500
Dave, Seriously, in all of this, there is one way to avoid all of it. Do not cheat. It is as simple as that. If you do not cheat it will not be likely you will be asked for anything. If you do cheat,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00314.html (16,638 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:54:52 -0500
Yes, Mark; Your interpretation is precisely correct. 73, Bob W5OV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00316.html (22,412 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Mark <markzl3ab@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:48:56 +1200
Hi Bob If I may clarify your reply on this topic. Are you saying: 1. The Committee will only request audio recordings where they believe an entrant has breached the rules. 2. In this instance where t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00317.html (20,762 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:21:31 -0300
You guys all get your knickers in a knot over nothing and/or have a real difficult time digesting what it is you are reading. First (a month or so ago) it was the sky was falling because you (collect
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00318.html (10,147 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:39:49 -0400
Bob, Thanks for giving the participants more insight into what's happening behind the 'closed doors' of the contest. I'm an admin for the SCQP and I can identify with your philosophy etc. In early 20
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00319.html (18,777 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:19:58 -0600
On 04/18/2017 05:02 PM, Jim Brown wrote: On Tue,4/18/2017 1:33 PM, Gerry Hull wrote: I end up winning. Am I disqualified because we did not record? All of these scenarios defy logic. The CQ committee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00320.html (10,978 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:44:58 -0300
Hi Mark my example for country top finish was wrong, here is what rules say: C. Audio Recordings: Any single operator entrant (see V.A.1) competing for a top three finish at the (a) World, (b) Contin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00322.html (25,430 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Committee blog post - audio recording (score: 1)
Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 08:28:39 -0600
That sure isn't what it says in http://cqww.com/blog/cqww-2016-ssb-self-spotting-and-entrant-audio-recordings/ Audio Recordings: Any single operator entrant (see V.A.1) competing for a top three fini
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00323.html (23,545 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu