Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+SSB\s+\"Go\s+away\s+DX\s+only\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+SSB\s+\"Go\s+away\s+DX\s+only\"\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: "Julio VE3FH" <ve3fh@yahoo.ca>; Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:19:59 -0400; FWIW... I was just trying to work my first zone 3 multipler on 15m and a booming N7 station kindly told me to "go away DX only"... have the rules changed or what? 73, Julio VE3FH ____________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00148.html (6,756 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:48:16 -0600; What do you expect, it's SSB :-) I was just casually tuning, giving out a few points to friend in the Caribb. I heard a VE5 on 20 last night ending every QSO with "Thank you, seventy three, q r z." N; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00149.html (8,794 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:24:32 -0700; Wow. This is a pet peeve. Same country is zero points, but a valid multiplier. I have seen several US stations do this same thing. I can understand not wanting the zero-point QSOs, but it is very uns; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00150.html (8,666 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:53:32 -0400; No, they haven't changed. Let's be kind and say that the op at the N7 station was mistaken or ill informed. It's either that, or... well, there's a name for people like that, but I don't think its us; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00151.html (8,958 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:54:09 -0500; You called an idiot. US and VE can work each other for points. 73, Julio VE3FH _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contestin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00152.html (8,874 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 14:53:40 -0700 (PDT); The rules haven't changed, Julio, but people seem to suffer more and more from malformed courtesy chromosomes. On another reflector there was a recent request for a logging feature which would reje; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00153.html (8,085 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:25:03 -0400; even stupider....as it was a VE calling a W/K.....points is points..... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00154.html (9,675 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 06:53:59 -0600; Yes, the new rule about unsportsmanlike conduct seems to be ignored by some: "Running stations not identifying in a timely manner (i.e., 1 minute)." 73, Steve, N2IC I was just casually tuning, giving; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00156.html (9,643 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: Dave Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:18:48 -0400 (GMT-04:00); Wait, a VE3 counts for points by a W/K. He is wrong. The contester needs to read the rules again. Dave K4JRB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00158.html (8,742 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:19:20 -0600; I know that one Q.. with a peanut station, doesn't mean a thing to the big boys... but IF I make a Q with a station,... it is NOT in MY best interest to fulfill HIS ego.. by waitin around for an ID..; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00159.html (9,629 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: Tom Francis <w1tef@swsports.org>; Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:28:33 -0400; I'm not a big SSB operator preferring CW, but you're right. I was going to handout a few Qs today just to help others out with an extra Q, but it seemed like every foreign op ignored the rule relying; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00160.html (10,995 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:29:17 -0500; This weekend I was listening to a pile-up that a CU station had going. It was a pretty good sized pile-up. I listened for at least 5 or 6 QSOs and he never ID'd, not once. One of the W guys he had ju; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00221.html (12,507 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB "Go away DX only" (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:13:06 -0700; Agreed. So why not list his call (if you remember it)? 73, Jim _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00227.html (9,324 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]