Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQM\s+Adjudication\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQM\s+Adjudication\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: ShelbyK4WW <shelbyk4ww@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 07:38:41 -0400; "Judging is carried out only on the received LOGs = if a participant doesnt submit the log, then other participants will have no QSO point nor multiplier point credits for the QSOs with him!" As this; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00039.html (7,939 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:19:55 +0100; As this was a "first time ever" to actually participate, not just make a few contacts, I find the unique approach toward scoring, indefensible? Contest sponsors are entitled to define whatever rules; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00041.html (8,045 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: James Cain <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:44:05 +0000; Shelby, if you disagree with a contest's rules/management, then don't participate. Works for me. K1TN "Judging is carried out only on the received LOGs = if a participant doesnt submit the log, then; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00042.html (8,528 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:31:41 -0400; Doesn't the Russian DX contest do something similar? I seem to remember that they not only give you no credit for some QSOs but also penalize you for others like NILs. Ria N2RJ ______________________; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00044.html (9,229 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: Hans Brakob <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 16:47:13 +0000; Not my circus, not my monkeys. If you dont like the rules, dont play. 73, de Hans, KØHB Just a Boy and his Radio ________________________________ From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+kzerohb=gmail.co; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00045.html (9,679 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 13:08:24 -0400; Or get on and just have fun like I doSent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -- Original message --From: James Cain <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com> Date: 5/11/20 12:27 PM (GMT-05:00) To: CQ-Contes; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00046.html (9,465 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: "Malin Dolinger" <malind@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 11:19:11 -0700; Hmmm.......[joke] let me see........if I contact the international space station during its next pass over Southern California, and they don't submit their log, did I actually contact them? Yes I did; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00047.html (8,083 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:43:27 -0500; Seems to me that one of the contest put on by a Japanese group used to be scored this way. I never participated in that particular contest, but that wasn't the reason why. -- Jim K0XU jim@rhodesend.n; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00050.html (9,221 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 08:46:12 +0500; Ria, Can you point me to the URL where it says about penalties for NILs in RDXC? 73, Igor UA9CDC 11.05.2020 21:31, rjairam@gmail.com : Doesn't the Russian DX contest do something similar? I seem to r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00053.html (8,303 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 10:15:40 -0400; Too many statements that it has to do with cheating. It really is all about accuracy. Contests originally simulated passing traffic accurately. That includes, not only the exchange, but, most importa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00054.html (9,068 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 10:42:46 -0400; Its rule 16: http://www.rdxc.org/asp/pages/rulesg.asp *16.* Penalties are counted as tripled good QSO points. - QSO is penalized for the following: - incorrectly logged calls (Bad Call) - incorrectly; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00055.html (10,194 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 11:12:00 -0400; Some contests will accept calls that didnt submit a log if that call appears in more than one log. That helps with uniques that are not bad copy. Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." _______; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00056.html (9,381 bytes)
13. [CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication (score: 1): Author: James Cain <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 15:33:23 +0000; -- Too many statements that it has to do with cheating. It really is all about accuracy. Contests originally simulated passing traffic accurately. That includes, not only the exchange, but, most impo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-05/msg00057.html (8,693 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]