Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+Committee\s+Restructured\s*$/: 56 ]

Total 56 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:05:37 -0400
I have to say this subject has been beat to death for years. There have been numerous suggestions for rule changes that always fall on deaf ears. The CQ Contest committee seems to operate like the Am
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00147.html (8,315 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:13:22 -0400
Randy's note well received for the current rules. I was mentioning that the change in the rules would be that easy. Ed CAUTION: The CQ WW log checking software ignores QSOs with your own call. I.e.,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00148.html (13,244 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:37:23 -0700
John's right. CQWW RTTY is a very fun contest, and pretty much implements the rules being bandied about here. I can attest that - while there is still the inevitable EU advantage from the east coast
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00152.html (9,336 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Dave Edmonds <dave@pkministrywebs.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 16:37:55 -0400
I'm enjoying this topic.... Here's my personal experience relating to contest management.... hang in there with me... I believe that one of the primary reasons for making a contest rule change is to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00154.html (11,299 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 07:04:37 +1000
We like the rules of the CQWW down under - We have a snow flakes chance in hell of winning but often grab single band slices - We contest against our own best score or the best score in our region. H
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00155.html (14,091 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 22:36:17 -0400
On 21/07/2016 17:04, Trent Sampson wrote: - you are making suggestions to change what is the most successful of all contests. This is not an argument : As it is the case for most products and brands
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00162.html (8,816 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Deepak VU2CDP <vu2cdp@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 08:32:29 +0530
Dave: Here in India we are doing just all that you have mentioned with respect to SCQP. A complete reboot of the Himalayan DX Contest; rules will be published on the ARSI website tomorrow. It will be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00164.html (14,183 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:52:46 -0500
Yet observe an not Asia And there we have most of a very workable solution - compete regionally, report regionally, recognize regionally. Thanks, Prasad. Trying to come up with some kind of a comple
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00175.html (10,149 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 17:19:40 -0500
Well put Ward. It really is impossible to make radio contesting fair in the sense of other sports that have balls, sticks, and a playing field. But, as you point out, we can minimize some of the vari
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00178.html (11,644 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:22:07 -0700
Perhaps the WWROF could be enticed into providing a central web location where regional etc. competitions can be organized, promoted, and results maintained and published. A place where you could go
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00180.html (9,536 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Chris Hurlbut <chriskl9a@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 14:24:38 -0600
Someone forgot to tell N6MJ that he is at a disadvantage in ZF. He's not allowed to win from there. -Chris KL9A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00183.html (9,514 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 23:11:53 +0000
Since CQWW is Zone centric, compete by Zone, not continent. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00186.html (12,876 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 23:26:13 +0000 (UTC)
Doesn't ZF have a mathematical scoring advantage over stations on other continents? From: Chris Hurlbut <chriskl9a@gmail.com> To: Jeffrey Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com Sen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00187.html (10,561 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 10:37:03 -0400
Not at all. During lower sunspot activity the Cayman Islands can have poor 10m and even 15m propagation to the US compared to islands further south. John KK9A ex ZF2JB Doesn't ZF have a mathematical
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00200.html (9,018 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: James Rodenkirch <Rodenkirch_LLC@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:30:46 +0000
Ward has suggested an attractive manner to obviate the sometimes divisive topic of leveling the geographic playing field for contests; e.g. for us U.S. residents, it may be as simple as choosing to b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00213.html (14,503 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured (score: 1)
Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 00:17:01 +0200
Antennas: Entry may be A1 or A2 A1: Single Element Antenna A2: Multiple Element Antenna or rotatable antenna (...) Some food for thought.....71.5/72 de Jim Rodenkirch K9JWV In the survey of WAG 2015
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00221.html (10,946 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu